< p >我怀疑这个图与极地气象意义上的漩涡。很难证明负面,但挖掘的来源这张照片让我在一些非常non-meteorological方向。< / p > < p > < a href = " https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: Growth_measure_and_vortices.jpg rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >文件本身< / >是名为“增长测量和漩涡”维基(注意没有“极地”),以“自己的工作”的来源(由用户“雪天气”)和描述“华德福高中射影几何块”。< / p > < p >除了“射影几何”页面中,唯一的维基百科页面上使用这张图片是< a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waldorf_education " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > < / >华德福教育,它描述为“学生工作从射影几何块华德福高中”。图像添加到< a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Projective_geometry& diff = 618435320, oldid = 611263327 " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >射影几何的文章< / >和< a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Waldorf_education& diff = 531490999, oldid = 531489396 " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >华德福的文章< / > < a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User: Clean_Copy rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >相同用户< / >(不是原始图像的上传),他似乎没有任何背景的气象。这使我怀疑,“极地”可能被添加到错误。< / p > < p >在射影几何的页面,图像描述为“根据劳伦斯·爱德华兹的工作”。几乎可以肯定,这一定是指爱德华兹的书< a href = " http://a。有限公司/ 3 upfxu4 nofollow noreferrer“rel = > < em >射影几何< / em > < / >,这似乎相当深奥的评论:< / p > < ul > <李> '现代唯物主义者的原因无法理解任何一种精神自然是他们的思维方式,纯粹基于感觉,太死板。这样的书可以帮助放松这样的刚性。李李' < / > < >“…爱德华兹(如使用的一些条款。 "breathing involution") may actually be his own creation… and this made cross-referencing the book with other projective geometry texts a little harder.’ The same author has written a book entitled The Vortex of Life – again, not related to meteorology – suggesting to me that he may be quite keen on the word ‘vortex’, perhaps in a broader or more unusual sense than one might find in the mainstream of scientific literature.
In short: the word ‘polar’ may or may not have been added in error by a Wikipedia editor, but in either case I am fairly confident that the ‘polar vortices’ referred to here have nothing to do with meteorology.