人体温度大约是37°C(99°F)，所以随着人口的增加，这是否会导致地球温度上升?< / p >

人体体温影响气候变化吗?直接吗?这甚至不是一个信号。地球人口是76亿。每个人辐射约80瓦(基础代谢)，大约是600千兆瓦，或760千兆瓦使用100瓦的整数。这听起来很多，但这只是人类消耗的18太瓦的一小部分，而人类消耗的18太瓦又只是地球从太阳接收的174太瓦的一小部分。

间接的。人口增长和人口增长对财富的渴望(第三世界国家和发展中国家希望摆脱这些类别)是气候变化的主要驱动因素。< / p >

If you put a warm bag somewhere, it will cool down and there will be no long-term impact to the climate. At best you'll affect the weather that day. Then there will cease to be warm bags.

The devil is in the details of what sustains the ongoing presence of warm bags. If you're making warm bags by burning fossil fuels, clearly that's a problem. If you're focusing light and warming them with solar energy, that may be less of a problem. If you're keeping them warm by metabolizing plants, it will depend greatly on the particular agricultural practices used.

Unfortunately, I don't think your question can have an answer. Human activity is inseparable from sustained human existence on Earth.

The most energy-conscious "proper" citizen, however, keeps a house heated rather than himself. The surface area of a house is large: insulating it is quite a larger task than insulating a single human (and requires a lot of material that needs to be produced, too). You'll need a whole lot more fuel for that even though you don't heat it to 37°C proper.

我们也是把氧气变成二氧化碳的机器…… So that can also be taken into consideration regarding hownare bodies affect climate change... Though again this measure almost nil...

所以NO，人体体温本身对地球温度没有直接的持久影响。在史前时期，植物暂时储存了数百万年的太阳能量，这些能量在地下的石油矿床中被长期封存了。 Humans have been drilling and pumping that oil out of the ground and burning it to make our lives easier/better, but in the process we are releasing millions of years worth of stored energy into the atmosphere in a relatively short amount of time. Much of that released energy radiates out into space, but some of it gets reflected back down to earth by the increasing CO2 levels in our atmosphere. And human’s burning of fossil fuels is the biggest contributor to adding new CO2 to our atmosphere.

Atomic energy powerplants release energy as heat into the atmosphere that would eventually be released into the atmosphere on its own by the radioactive elements themselves even if humans weren’t manipulating them, but at an accelerated rate.

Storing and then using renewable energy such as solar and wind (wind energy originates as the sun’s solar energy moves air around our atmosphere, plus some kinetic energy from the rotation of the earth) are net neutral to our planet.

The energy stored in and released from the earth’s core is another factor that we’ll save for another discussion. In the meantime, let’s all accept that our planet is warming as a result of humans releasing prehistoric energy into the atmosphere at a relatively rapid rate compared to how long it took for that energy to accumulate. (Mic drop)

The metabolic heat human bodies produce comes from energy supplied by the food we eat. The energy in that food came from solar energy converted to carbohydrates and proteins by photosynthesis and plant metabolism, either directly (as plant based food) or indirectly (as food for animal products and meat) - it doesn't add energy that was not already present in the climate system.

But the fossil fuel burning that contributed to cultivation, transport, storage and cooking do add energy not already present - from the heat of combustion of energy in long term carbon sinks added directly and an estimated 100x that heat added to the climate system from enhanced greenhouse effect indirectly from the CO2 released.