现代农业的生产力取决于多少草甘膦吗?

2017 - 12 - 01 - t09:16:25z

草甘膦是最重要的除草剂在农业的数量。欧盟委员会最近< A href = " https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/nov/27/controversial-glyphosate-weedkiller-wins-new-five-year-lease-in-europe " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > < / >投票反对禁止的物质,经过激烈的争论在对人类健康可能造成的负面影响。我现在看到很多请愿书出现在社交媒体上,呼吁立即禁令。这引发了我的思考:如果草甘膦将被禁止在不久的将来,在明年的过程中,农民会产生什么问题?有可行的选择除草剂,生产力会显著降低不使用一个?

答案由BillDOe多少现代农业的生产力取决于草甘膦吗?

2017 - 12 - 01 - t22:06:28z

化学并不是一件坏事;生活取决于它。仅仅因为一个杀虫剂或除草剂是天然或合成几乎与它的毒性。许多所谓的天然或有机农药比广泛使用合成的强许多倍,像< a href = " https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/11/22/myth-busting-natural-pesticides-really-safer-synthetic-ones/?mc_cid=0b51d1b46a& mc_eid = d552c8b21b " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >这篇文章< / >提到。 是否草甘膦是必要的,< a href = " https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/11/28/eu-re-approval-glyphosate-herbicide-dodges-farming-economic-woes-now/?mc_cid=110fedeb39& mc_eid = d552c8b21b " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >本文< / >解释了一些直接的经济影响草甘膦禁令。的影响包括:< blockquote >…法国研究所Arvalis禁令将成本建议中国农业行业9.76亿欧元(合11亿美元)。在德国,Kleffmann集团表示限制可能会损害大麦和玉米产出利润率收缩40到70来自农民开始种植替代,更有利可图的作物。 与此同时,在英国,2014年总量220万公顷的三分之一的可耕种土地处理草甘膦,牛津经济研究院估计影响小麦产量减少12%,油料强奸/收益率14%,谷物产量15%。农业贡献国家的国内生产总值将萎缩约£9.3亿(12.3亿美元)。
In another article I recall reading (but can't find the citation for), Glyphosate is applied at a rate of only one pint per acre. Farms are not drenched in it as many anti-Glyphosate advocates would have us believe.

As to whether or not Glyphosate is a carcinogen, this article calls much of that into question. Apparently, there were individuals involved who might have benefited substantially by having Glyphosate declared a human carcinogen.

Edit:Some other interesting articles:

This article from Factcheck.org had this interesting tidbit

Q: Does the herbicide glyphosate cause cancer?

A: There is evidence to suggest it may cause cancer at very high doses, but not at the low doses typically found in foods.

and

The European Chemicals Agency...concluded in March 2017 that “the available scientific evidence did not meet the criteria to classify glyphosate as a carcinogen.”

And this article from the-scientist.com said

A new study has found no conclusive link between exposure to glyphosate—the main ingredient in a popular weedkiller—and cancer.

And Reuters in this piece said:

The World Health Organization's cancer agency says a common weedkiller is "probably carcinogenic." The scientist leading that review knew of fresh data showing no cancer link - but he never mentioned it and the agency did not take it into account.

现代农业的生产力取决于多少草甘膦吗?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换

现代农业的生产力取决于多少草甘膦吗?

答案由BillDOe多少现代农业的生产力取决于草甘膦吗?