为什么五大湖不被认为是海洋?-地江南体育网页版球科学堆栈交换江南电子竞技平台 最近30个来自www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 04 - 07 - t05:03:45z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/14212 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/14212 19 为什么五大湖不被认为是海洋? 满足 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/1388 2018 - 05 - 20 - t19:16:08z 2022 - 01 - 26 t13:25:16z 从我看地图,除了里海和五大湖,我看到这些海洋和湖泊的共同之处:

海洋

  • 大多数是咸水
  • 通过地峡,海峡,河流或海湾连接到海洋的其余部分
  • 比湖泊更大更深

湖泊

  • 大多数是淡水
  • 内陆
  • 没有任何海洋那么大或深

所以回到这两个水体的问题上。一些人认为里海是一个湖,另一些人认为它是一个海。虽然从历史上看,它可能是海洋的一部分,但现在它是内陆的,所以它更适合称为里海盐湖,从而使它成为地球上最大的湖泊,也是最大的盐湖。至少对我来说,五大湖也是个问题。虽然世界上大多数人都认为它们是湖泊,而且它们在历史上是一个湖泊(实际上,连接它们的河流和小湖泊相比之下太小了,基本上是一个水体),但伊利运河从那时起就把这些湖泊连接到圣劳伦斯河。所以叫它大淡水海更合适。我不知道它在面积上如何与地中海等其他海域相提并论,但它将是世界上为数不多的淡水海之一(与加利利海相连)。

那么为什么五大湖不被认为是淡水海,而除了淡水,它们本质上就像任何其他的海一样?< / p >

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/14212/-/14213#14213 40 为什么五大湖不被认为是海洋? 马克 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/2643 2018 - 05 - 20 - t20:53:01z 2018 - 05 - 21 - t09:39:50z “海”vs“湖”vs“只是海洋的一部分”有点模糊,但关于海洋有两件事是普遍的:

  • 它们是咸的。
  • 它们要么是endorheic,要么是海平面(受潮汐影响)与海洋相连。

现在,让我们看看五大湖在这些标准下是什么样子。

  • 生理盐水?不,盐度是0,给予或采取测量误差。即使是公认盐度最低的波罗的海,其含盐量也要高得多,只有0.5%。李李< / > < >内流水吗?不,它们是通过圣劳伦斯河连接到海洋的,并且已经存在了至少一万年。
  • 海平面连接?不,圣劳伦斯河在安大略湖出水口下方有约500公里的非潮汐流,它在上面下降75米。

得分:0 / 3。五大湖被认为是湖泊而不是海洋,这并不奇怪

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/14212/-/14217#14217 9 为什么五大湖不被认为是海洋? Luaan //www.hoelymoley.com/users/217 2018 - 05 - 21 - t08:21:30z 2018 - 05 - 21 - t08:21:30z 从地质学的角度来看,两者有很大的不同。< / p >

The Caspian Sea is thought to be the remnant of an ocean that got cut off from the ocean system (similar to how the Mediterranean might have been periodically cut off and re-connected to the oceans) due to tectonic uplift and a drop in sea levels. The Black Sea was part of the same ocean, but has a much lower inflow than it loses to evaporation - hence the Black Sea has a salinity much higher than the oceans, while the Caspian Sea has a salinity significantly lower than the oceans.

The Great Lakes could be considered a failed ocean. They are in a place where rifting started to create a new ocean, but it never got connected to the ocean system (and flooded), and that was still the case when the rifting eventually stopped. Those rifts were then further (much later) "excavated" by glaciers. The large depressions got filled with melt water (at the end of the last ice age) and rainwater over time, as is typical of many other large/deep lakes. Unsurprisingly, the glacier-sourced melt water wasn't very salty.

In the future, the Caspian Sea will probably get slightly saltier, and filled with sediment. While the influx of fresh water has driven the salinity relatively low compared to the oceans, the sea now only loses water through evaporation - so there's no way for the (tiny amounts) of incoming salts and (relatively large amounts) of sediment to go. As the depth decreases, there might be some expansion of the surface area, but that's mostly temporary - it increases the evaporation rate without increasing the inflow, so water is lost over time.

In contrast, the Great Lakes have an outflow into the ocean, which carries away a lot of the dissolved salts and sediment. Right now, the outflow, combined with evaporation both natural and man made, is larger than the inflow. Overall, this means it's not going to get saltier over time - it keeps pretty much constant salinity, which is pretty much zero compared to the oceans. As erosion continues over the Saint Lawrence River, the outflow will probably increase, resulting in a drop in the water levels of the lakes. However, unlike e.g. the Black Sea, this will not increase the salinity, since the salts are lost through the outflow, rather than being concentrated by evaporation.

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/14212/-/17149#17149 4 为什么五大湖不被认为是海洋? 半日西蒙 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/39 2019 - 06 - 06 - t19:55:31z 2019 - 06 - 06 - t19:55:31z 其他的回答提出了一些将事物分为海洋或湖泊的方法,这是很好的指南,但不可避免地,所有这些都有例外。最终,这种差异不是海洋或水文的差异,而是语义和文化的差异。水体的名称是历史上的,所以它们的名称是过去人们认为合适的称呼,而不是任何现代分类学
Baidu
map