< p >当别人已经在评论中指出,没有地震数据扩展,追溯。但我们确实有数据在过去的世纪。以类似的方式对我的答案< a href = " //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/13131/is-there-any-correlation-between-grand-solar-minimums-gsm-and-earthquakes?rq = 1 " > < / >这个问题。这里策划年度统计从1900年到2018年全球的所有地震的震级大的7.5,8,或8.5在< a href = " https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/ " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >美国地质调查局的地震目录< / >跨回到1900年(酒吧),随着太阳黑子的总数每年从< a href = " http://www.sidc.be/silso/datafiles #总”rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >太阳黑子指数和长期的太阳观测< / >(红线)。这是合成图:< / p > < p > < a href = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/FFhVs.png " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > < img src = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/FFhVs.png " alt = "在这里输入图像描述" > < / > < / p > < p >正如你所看到的,没有任何明显的联系频率的任何大小和太阳活动的大地震。太阳记录显示明晰11年太阳活动周期(实际上< a href = " https://scied.ucar.edu/sunspot-cycle " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >这是一个22年周期< / >有两个类似的部分)。另一方面,地震显示没有明确的模式。< / p >Unfortunately, for the grand minimums like Maunder and Dalton's solar minimums we do not have a reliable earthquake record. Nevertheless, given that EVERYTHING we know about physics and earthquakes suggest that there is NO mechanism by which solar activity could possibly influence earthquakes. And provided that there is no evidence of such correlation in the 100+ years of the instrumental record. There is absolutely no reason to believe that such correlation exist. The answer to this question should be informative too.