没有风化侵蚀?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 06 - t19:35:22z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/15912 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/15912 1 没有风化侵蚀? 迪帕克Chaudhary //www.hoelymoley.com/users/14742 2019 - 01 - 09 - t12:37:37z 2020 - 01 - 20 - t07:43:01z < p >我的地理书,以下句子写:< / p > < p > < em >尽管艾滋病风化侵蚀,它不是一个前提条件的侵蚀。< / em > < / p > < p >我怎么能证明呢?我知道的几乎所有形式的侵蚀发生在风化岩石。我们有任何的例子没有风化侵蚀?作为<强>脱衣或风化手段发现< / >强,和侵蚀意味着<强> < /强>转移。< / p >

So far I came up with one example: Blast eruption of volcano makes small stones and pebbles, which could be carried by waves, rivers etc.

 //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/15912/-/15913 # 15913 1 尼罗的回答没有风化侵蚀? 尼罗 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/13870 2019 - 01 - 09 - t13:42:00z 2019 - 01 - 09 - t13:42:00z < p >火山爆破的情况下固体岩石成更小的片段仍然通常被视为风化。尽管如此,对你的案例来证明这句话,你可以考虑通过峡湾冰川冲刷或岩石的山谷。然而,粒子是“脱下”之前从事运输过程定义意味着风化。只有在冰川中它不作为前提< / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/15912/-/15914 # 15914 10 弗雷德的回答没有风化侵蚀? 弗雷德 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/2470 2019 - 01 - 09 - t14:06:02z 2019 - 01 - 09 - t14:06:02z < p >风化的概念是错误的。这不是揭露或脱材料。Weathering is a very slow process of breaking down rocks, soil & minerals, in-situ, via contact with the Earth's atmosphere, water & biological organisms. This can also involve heat & pressure.

Erosion, as you state, involves the moving of material. This can happen due to the action of running water, the impact of water via waves on coastal environments, wind or glaciers dislodging grains of geological material irrespective of whether it is weathered or not. Landslides are another form of erosion.

Baidu
map