< p >简短的回答是的,可能会有副作用。< / p > < p >长答案。他们正在看的不仅仅是硫酸盐。初步研究表明乐观缺乏对硫酸盐的副作用但我们不会知道直到我们实际测试和测试在1公里区域,多次尝试,已经封锁了环境问题。问题存在,因为我们无法测试它,因为它的环境问题了。< / p > < p >要记住的是,最初的想法是< / p > < ol > <李>提出震惊科学界研究多种渠道,洛厄尔木1999年(我找不到源,但维基百科的文章所以你们会。)< /李> <李>是基于火山的冷却效果。< /李> < / ol > < p >第二点是最重要的,因为我们有一种自然现象的工作。在90年代有一个火山喷发,使全球气温降低了~ 1.5度(我认为这是C)在18个月之前的事情恢复正常。这意味着我们可以研究火山的影响和预测的影响气溶胶注入。火山的副作用包括大对植被的影响和冷却但小其他引用的文章我看过。 Fortunately, they believe that aerosolized injection into the upper atmosphere will avoid affecting plants very much if at all as the particles will mostly stay up there. However, there is concern that it might modify our atmosphere in some unknown way. I have seen some articles saying sulfur emissions in China/asia might actually already be helping lower global temperatures a little but the idea was theoretical and the articles mostly seemed like clickbait.
Really we aren't sure and need to do some testing to find out. However, this will be small scale testing that will ramp up slowly.