“碳中性”(大约)5 Gt公司₂等价?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 08 - t19:04:08z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/16606 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/16606 4 “碳中性”(大约)5 Gt公司₂等价? t·凯莉 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/15500 2019 - 03 - 30 - t17:03:53z 2019 - 04 - 09 - t01:29:59z < p >政府间气候变化专门委员会设立的一个关键目标是到2050年实现碳中和。也就是说,人类的总温室气体排放小于碳吸收。我在努力找到一个好的来源,第二个数字的值。<强>的体积是多少每年吸收温室气体,全球。< /强> < / p > < p >值< a href = " https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/summary-for-policy-makers/c/spm3a/ " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > < / >净排放在IPCC 1.5特别报道,和总总排放量中引用< a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_greenhouse_gas_emissions " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > < / >,这的维基百科页面放的数量大约在5 gt公司₂e。这是正确的,并且有一个更精确的来源吗?还是我误解了什么? < / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/16606/is-carbon-neutral-roughly-5-gt-co%e2%82%82-equivalent/16673 # 16673 3 Deditos回答的是“碳中性”(大约)5 Gt公司₂等价? Deditos //www.hoelymoley.com/users/106 2019 - 04 - 07 - t18:28:54z 2019 - 04 - 08 - t10:00:43z < p >正如Camilo在评论中提到的,“碳中性”在这种情况下意味着零净碳排放。这是总人为碳排放(化石燃料燃烧和土地利用变化)-碳吸收< em > < / em >通过管理实践。这种区别是非常重要的;你不包括海洋和陆地碳吸收通过< em > < / em >自然过程来抵消总排放量的计算。自2010年以来,联合国环境规划署每年发表了一份“排放缺口”报告,包括一些相关的排放数量:< / p > < blockquote > < p > 2017年排放的温室气体(GHG)排放,不包括土地利用变化——达到创纪录的49.2 GtCO2e……排放从土地利用变化……添加另一个4.2 GtCO2 GtCO2e总数达到53.5。< / p > < p >来源:< a href = " https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/emissions -差距报告- 2018“rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >环境规划署排放差异报告2018年< / > < / p > < /引用> < p >下面是一个不错的各种负面的发射技术的示意图(网),这可以作为缓解总体预算:< / p > < blockquote > < p > < a href = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/HPdgp.jpg " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > < img src = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/HPdgp.jpg " alt = "在这里输入图像描述" / > < / > < / p > < p >来源:史密斯et al(2016)“生物物理和经济限制负二氧化碳排放”,< a href = " https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2870 " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2870 < / > < / p > < /引用> < p >碳捕获和储存(CCS)是在燃烧化石燃料,所以化石总值减少排放。面板(g)叫做LULUCF(土地利用、土地利用变化和林业)的排放差距报告和AFOLU(农业、林业和其他土地使用)在IPCC 1.5特别报道,这实际上是+ 4.2 GtCO2e /年引用。未来的想法是,土地管理必须改变把土地从净源管理温室气体的净碳汇。 As for Bio-energy Carbon Capture Systems (BECCS), the current levels are about zero, although there are a dozen or so demonstrator projects totalling about 0.001 GtCO2/year. So at the moment it barely makes a dent in the overall budget, but mitigation scenarios require it rising to an order of 10 GtCO2/year by 2050:

enter image description here

The energy production from the use of BECCS over time in a range of mitigation scenarios.

Source: van Vuuren et al (2018) “Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies”, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0119-8

The IPCC special report also has a nice schematic of how NETs contribute to emissions scenarios. Although there's no timescale on the schematic, most of the actual scenarios don't show any notable BECCS until 2030.

enter image description here

Figure 2.5 | Evolution and break down of global anthropogenic CO2 emissions until 2100

Source: Rogelj et al (2018) "Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development", Chapter 2 of the IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C.

Baidu
map