俄罗斯钻井作业Vostok湖成功了吗?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 04 - 05 - t16:54:23z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/17725 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/17725 3 俄罗斯钻井作业Vostok湖成功了吗? 迈克尔Walsby //www.hoelymoley.com/users/17166 2019 - 08 - 12 - t10:59:03z 2021 - 09 - 02 - t11:42:32z < p >几年前俄罗斯开始在大约2公里的冰达到Vostok湖在南极洲。这是希望他们能在那里找到生物冰下埋葬了许多数百万年。他们将获得信息从冰核中提取,但预计大发现当他们到达底部,预计这将是一个巨大的深湖的液态淡水。< / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/17725/-/18887 # 18887 9 回答的让-玛丽•Prival俄罗斯钻井作业Vostok湖成功了吗? 让-玛丽•Prival //www.hoelymoley.com/users/18081 2020 - 01 - 06 - t09:41:02z 2020 - 01 - 06 - t09:41:02z < p >俄国人“成功”达到了水钻孔5 g - 2 2012年。然而,湖水涌入井下由于超压,和冻结。他们再次钻在接下来的竞选品尝这道refrozen湖水,但发现它是由钻井液污染(DF)。从< a href = " https://doi.org/10.1144/SP461.3 " rel = " noreferrer " > Alekhina et al . 2017 < / >: < / p > < blockquote > < p >正如预期的那样,冷冻水的污染水平与DF核心成分减少采样深度的增加。然而,即使3450年样本,最深和最干净的研究,国外有机化合物的浓度(16.7毫克l−1)表明重要的化学污染,尤其是对水一样纯净,我们将跟Vostok获得[…]在钻孔水位不断上升后5 g - 2到达结的两个钻孔并继续上升5 g - 1,级的钻井液仍被困在废弃的井眼开始流离失所较重的水。因此,约1 t的DF从底部上升5 g - 1的湖水列级已经充满了钻孔。在这个过程中,不断上升的DF混合,从而污染,冰冷的水。< / p > < /引用> < p >由于这种污染,任何生物学结果从这些冰核科学界将是无效的。之后,俄罗斯人钻新井眼(5三大),他们据称设法样品纯净,未被污染的水在2015年(这是< a href = " https://www.rt.com/news/226127-lake-vostok-russia-water/ " rel = " noreferrer " >新闻稿从RT < / >,这是< em > < / em >不被视为中立源…)。但是,我找不到任何发表的结果从这个样品。 And the same year, Russia cut Vostok project's budget... So I doubt we will see anything coming out of this in the future.

On a more positive note, scientists did manage to drill through 800 meters of Antarctica ice to reach another lake, lake Whillans, without contaminating it (they used only hot water to drill, not drilling fluid). And they did find "a diverse assemblage of bacteria and archaea". From Christner et al. 2014:

Our data show that SLW supports a metabolically active and phylogenetically diverse ecosystem that functions in the dark at sub-zero temperatures, confirming more than a decade of circumstantial evidence regarding the presence of life beneath Antarctica’s ice sheet [...] Given the prevalence of subglacial water in Antarctica, our data from SLW lead us to contend that aquatic microbial ecosystems are common features of the subsurface environment that exists beneath the ~10$\small\mathsf{^7}$ km$\small\mathsf{^2}$/s Antarctic ice sheet.

However, there is a major difference with lake Vostok: lake Whillans is connected to a hydrological system, while lake Vostok is "closed" and has a water residence time of over 10,000 years. So if life is trapped in there, it could have evolved differently...

Baidu
map