ECMWF和NOAA预测数据的准确性——地球科学堆栈交换江南电子竞技平台江南体育网页版 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 08 - t20:51:20z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/18728 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/18728 2 ECMWF和NOAA预测数据的准确性 CB001 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/18498 2019 - 12 - 18 - t00:31:56z 2019 - 12 - 18 - t08:56:08z

I'm a novice software developer who's about to write some Python scripts for getting weather data from several U.S. stations, as well as a few in the Pacific (for checking Southern Oscillation Index & the like).

I've been oriented toward NOAA's site mostly, but having seen some mentions about 'European models' of weather forecasting in various articles over the past year, I wonder if it would be better to look toward mining the ECMWF.

Basically, I'm looking at current surface temperature and wind speeds, then trying to get a daily forecast out to 15-20 days forward. Haven't dug into ECMWF yet, but on NOAA's site, they do provide probabilistic outlooks, albeit on a monthly frequency (example). I could always check weather.com's 10-Day or Monthly, but again, I'm wondering about the accuracy.

Anyone with experience comparing forecasted vs actual results on a thorough basis, and can share some perspective?

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/18728/-/18732 # 18732 3 回答的呼呼声ECMWF和NOAA预测数据的准确性 呼呼声 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/17522 2019 - 12 - 18 - t08:22:57z 2019 - 12 - 18 - t08:56:08z < p >你可以比较验证分数使用< a href = " https://apps.ecmwf.int/wmolcdnv/scores/mean/msl " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >这个应用程序从ECMWF < / >由世界气象组织的指导方针。下面的例子是广为人知的证据相吻合,即IFS (ECMFWF全球模型)最好成绩一般。近年英国气象局全球模型的得分也比GFS。该图显示了MSLP的均方根误差。下面的例子当然仅覆盖验证了一个月,所以你应该检查更长,专注于你最感兴趣的领域。< / p > < p > < a href = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/ruiSm.png " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > < img src = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/ruiSm.png " alt =“MSLP验证”> < / > < / p >
Baidu
map