最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 09 - t10:59:29z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/194 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/194 10 gerrit //www.hoelymoley.com/users/6 2014 - 04 - 16 - t19:31:31z 2014 - 07 - 04 - t17:21:43z

< p >气象卫星Metop-A < a href = " http://www.wmo-sat.info/oscar/satellites/view/306 " > < / >和< a href = " http://www.wmo-sat.info/oscar/satellites/view/307 " > Metop-B < / >携带的副本< a href = " http://www.wmo-sat.info/oscar/instruments/view/184 " >高分辨率红外辐射探测器< / > (HIRS),与传统乐器< a href = " http://www.wmo-sat.info/oscar/instruments/view/181 " > 1975 < / >。考虑到< a href = " http://www.wmo-sat.info/oscar/satellites/view/308 " > Metop-C < / >是< a href = " http://www.wmo-sat.info/oscar/satelliteprogrammes/view/44 " >相同的项目< / > Metop-A Metop-B,和操作卫星在同一项目通常携带相同的负载,为什么没有HIRS Metop-C ? < / p >

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/194/-/2221 # 2221 5 f.thorpe //www.hoelymoley.com/users/543 2014 - 07 - 04 - t17:21:43z 2014 - 07 - 04 - t17:21:43z

< p > HIRS美国航天局的传统设计,是一个古老的欧洲和美国气象卫星的一部分EUMETSAT / NOAA初始联合极地系统。Inrared大气探测干涉仪(雅西)将接管的职责HIRS,由于雅西是一个更强大的欧洲卫星仪器与欧洲设计的。你可以看到这里的讨论:< / p > < p > < a href = " http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/The_Living_Planet_Programme/Meteorological_missions/MetOp/About_HIRS_4/%28print%29 " rel = " noreferrer " > http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/The_Living_Planet_Programme/Meteorological_missions/MetOp/About_HIRS_4/(印刷)< / > < / p > < p >我的观点是,从历史上看,美国国际环境卫星的领导者。欧洲现在有更好的设计和更承诺在未来几十年里环境卫星的计划。所以,从本质上讲,他们不需要我们的过时的硬件了。< / p >

map