< p >你可能忘记压力也随高度(指数)。另外,因为< span class = " math-container " > P = \ρrt美元< / span >, < span class = " math-container " > $ \压裂{dP} {dT} = \ρ< / span >雷亚尔(也就是说,< span class = " math-container " > c_p < / span >美元不出现)。但在回答你的问题我跑题了。< / p > < p >让我们打破为什么潜在温度随高度增加。先方程:< span class = " math-container " > $ $ \θ= T \离开(\压裂{P_0} {P} \右)^{\压裂{R_d} {c_p}}{1} \标签$ $ < / span >现在,如果我们想问为什么< span class = " math-container " > \θ< / span >美元增加高度,让我们换种<跨类= " math-container " > (1) < / span >美元作为高度的函数:< span class = " math-container " > $ $ \θ(z)左= T (z) \[\压裂{P_0} {P (z)} \右]^{\压裂{R_d} {c_p}} \标记{2}$ $ < / span >现在如果你遵循< a href = " //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/19517/derivative-of-exner-function/19519 # 19519 " >我推导< / >寻找< span class = " math-container " > $ $ \压裂{\部分\θ}{\部分z} = \压裂{\θ}{T} \离开(\压裂{\部分T}{\部分z} + \压裂{g} {c_p} \右)$ $ < / span > < / P > < P >您可能会注意到,< span class = " math-container " > $ \压裂{\部分\θ}{\部分z} = 0 < / span >敌我识别美元。< span class = " math-container " > $ \压裂{\部分T}{\部分z} = - \压裂{g} {c_p} = -9.8 \ textrm {K公里}^ {1}$ < / span >(干绝热温度梯度)。If $\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}>-\frac{g}{c_p}$ then $\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z}>0$. This does not mean that the parcel is not adiabatic, though. For a parcel to be truly adiabatic, $\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial t}+u\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}+v\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y}+w\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z}=0$ Therefore, the only time a certain location can be considered adiabatic and have $\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z}=0$ is when there is no heating ($\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial t}=0$), and no horizontal advection of $\theta$ ($u\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}+v\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y}=0$). Note, I did not exclude vertical advection of $\theta$, because that is implied in the condition that $\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z}=0$.
I'll also take pause here and list a few diabatic processes, and why there may be some justification to ignore them for your mental image.
- Radiation: with the exception of greenhouse gases, the atmosphere is mostly transparent.
- Surface heating/ turbulent transport: more important near the surface (note that $\theta$ is a minimum at the surface).
- Clouds/microphysical processes: discrete and are never everywhere all the time and moisture is a completely separate variable that varies all the time. There is a way around that (to some extent- the equivalent potential temperature, for latent heat exchange).
- Chemical processes: See below about how I remember $\theta$ increases with height.
If you want a good reminder of why $\theta$ increases with height, it might be easier to remember that $sgn \left( \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z}\right)$ is a good indicator of static stability. And thunderstorms need to stop at some point, even if that is the tropopause (where $\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial z}>0$ due to ozone heating).