观察< p > < / p > < ul > <李>有一个更高层次的PM2.5污染的房子外面。阅读是在80 - 150范围内由于野火。在PurpleAir.com (PM2.5水平取决于传感器的传感器网络)< /李> <李>使用手持空气监测,可以测量室内PM2.5监测读数。李李< / > < >大多数房间阅读+ / - 40了,但是一个房间读450年李< / > <李>烟霾在房间可以看到最高读数(提醒我们这个问题)< /李> <李>外通常是低相对湿度(30 - 40%)< /李> <李>高的房间阅读(450 PM2.5) < ul > <李>高湿度(80 - 90%),以支持热带植物< /李> <李>窗口从1990年代(老,不要密封)< /李> <李>一个阁楼访问面板,允许一些空气流动李< / > <李>没有球迷,能够吸引空气从外面或推动空气< /李> <李>房间外又长又瘦(40 'x15”)与windows沿长轴和一扇门走了一半40”< /李> <李>轴一端具有较高的湿度(加湿器)< /李> < / ul > < /李> <李>把3小房间里的HEPA过滤器可以减少PM2.5 5在大约一个小时。约10小时后,读数的PM2.5更高80 - 400 < /李> <李>如果我们减少PM2.5在10和把门关上一半40的轴的房间,低湿度的PM2.5的门保持自由,而门的PM2.5高湿度一侧继续增加。 there is no internal source of PM2.5 - this only started this week as smoke has blown into the area Q: what's the likelihood that the humidity differential between indoors and outdoors is "pumping" air and effectively pulling smoke indoors?
Q. What's the likelihood of the humidity differential being able to concentrate the smoke indoors (there have been no readings outside that come close to the 450 PM2.5 that was seen indoors, could the humidity differential be "pumping" pollution indoors and concentrating it)?
Q. what else might be contributing or causing this?