有什么山的照片没有显著侵蚀地球上(或其他)——地球科学栈交流江南电子竞技平台江南体育网页版 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 06 - t19:18:42z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/2122 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/2122 13 有什么山的照片没有显著侵蚀地球上(或其他) n .处女座 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/215 2014 - 06 - 15 - t04:16:18z 2022 - 12 - 27 - t12:41:59z < p >我很好奇关于山在一个真空的世界如月球表面看起来如果你站,看着他们。有很多艺术家的印象,当然,但我好奇是否有任何现有的照片这样的一个场景。< / p >

From browsing photographs of the Moon landings, there are a few surprisingly rounded-looking low hills on the horizon, but not what you'd call an actual mountain. This makes sense, since the missions targeted large flat areas where it would be safe to land. There are photographs of mountains seen from Lunar orbit, but not from the surface.

There are photographs of Mount Sharp from the Curiosity mission to Mars, but Mars has an atmosphere, and to my untrained eye Mount Sharp looks quite eroded.

So I'm wondering whether there are any such photos in existence at all - either because a probe has landed on an airless body close enough to a mountain to get a picture, or because a camera in orbit has been aimed at the horizon in order to capture a mountain range from the same angle at which it would be seen from the surface.

Alternatively, are there any mountains on Earth where (for whatever reason) erosion hasn't played a big role in shaping them so far, and which therefore look similar to the uneroded mountains one would find on an airless world?

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/2122/-/2123 # 2123 18 回答大卫Hammen有什么山的照片没有显著侵蚀地球上(或其他) 大卫Hammen //www.hoelymoley.com/users/239 2014 - 06 - 15 - t09:47:44z 2022 - 12 - 27 - t12:41:59z < p >的19世纪的天文学家认为月亮会出现:< / p > < p > < img src = " https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/Old_view_moon.jpg/403px-Old_view_moon.jpg " alt = " / > < br / > < em >娱乐在天文学< / em > h·D·沃伦·D·D。发表于1879年,通过< a href = " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selenography " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selenography < / >。< / p > < p >阿波罗15号的宇航员所看到的:< / p > < p > < a href = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/hwBZV.jpg " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > < img src = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/hwBZV.jpg " alt = " / > < / > < br / > <子>(来源:< a href = " https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/alhat/apoll15_comp20081223 - 640. - jpg”rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > nasa.gov < / >) < /订阅> < br / > < / p > < blockquote > < p >阿波罗15号登月舱猎鹰Hadley-Apennine着陆点。哈德利δ在后台增加大约4000米(约13124英尺)。山的底部约5公里(约3英里)远。< / p >

Source: NASA, from Four Out of Six Apollos.

Below is a photograph of the even taller Mons Hadley, 1.1 km taller than Hadley Delta shown above:

Source: NASA, photograph as15-86-11603, from Apollo Imagery.

Compare the above with mountains on the Earth. Here's a picture of Mont Blanc, a mountain here on the Earth comparable in size to the smaller of the two lunar mountains portrayed above:

Photograph by Zoharby, taken from Wikimedia Commons, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license.


Alternatively, are there any mountains on Earth where (for whatever reason) erosion hasn't played a big role in shaping them so far, and which therefore look similar to the uneroded mountains one would find on an airless world?

Nathaniel, you have a mistaken view of erosion. Erosion eventually does tear the tallest mountains down to tiny little hills. However, erosion also makes those tall mountains very jagged at first. Erosion is the primary reason why Mont Blanc and other new, tall mountains are so jagged. Liquid water seeps into cracks in the rocks and then freezes into ice. Ice has a lower density than water. This means that liquid water expands upon freezing. That expansion breaks the rock that form mountains into jagged edges.

Another reason our mountains are jagged is plate tectonics. The Earth is the only body in the solar system that exhibits plate tectonics. New continental crust forms largely from older continental crust. Erosion eventually brings particles torn from mountains to a flat area or river delta, where they collect. The material brought to those collection areas changes over time. The end result: Strata (layered rock formations). The different strata in rock have different strengths and weaknesses and thus erode differently. That differential erosion results in jagged mountains.


Bottom line: You don't see jagged mountains on the Moon or Mars because they don't have water in all three phases and because they don't have plate tectonics.
//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/2122/-/2493 # 2493 7 答案由n .处女座有什么山的照片没有显著侵蚀地球上(或其他) n .处女座 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/215 2014 - 09 - 16 - t07:40:07z 2016 - 09 - 30 - t13:43:07z < p >后,我问这个问题,< a href = " http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >罗塞塔任务< / >发回一些光荣的图片那样参差不齐的岩石在任何科幻书的封面:< / p > < p > < img src = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/yC6tY.png " alt = "在这里输入图像描述" > < / p > < p >我想不同的是,这些都是表面上的彗星,不像月亮,是地质活动。< / p > < p >这些都不是你所说的山脉——整个核只有4公里长,所以必须数百米的大小显示的功能。但是,我会想象刚形成的山脉会看起来像这样没有侵蚀。< / p > < p >不雨则已,一雨倾盆。这是一个光荣的山脉在冥王星的照片来自美国宇航局的“新视野”号的任务,从2015年9月。冥王星是另一个(惊人的)地质活跃的世界,显然小侵蚀。这些人真的是山,高约三公里。他们可能是水冰而不是石头做的,这是很难在这些温度。他们还apprear非常参差不齐的。< / p >

enter image description here

I conclude from this that mountains on active worlds without erosion will generally appear jagged; the smoothness of the Moon's mountains is not due to the absence of erosion - rather, they're smoothed because of erosion, which in the Moon's case is primarily due to micrometeorites and takes place over a very long time. This is possible because the Moon is not geologically active, so its mountains are far older than the ones in the pictures above.

Finally, I can't resist editing again to add another image from the Rosetta mission, taking during the spacecraft's final descent before a controlled collision with the comet in September 2016. It's just an incredibly beautiful image. (source)

enter image description here

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/2122/-/2976 # 2976 8 Gimelist回答的有山的照片没有显著侵蚀地球上(或其他) Gimelist //www.hoelymoley.com/users/725 2014 - 12 - 07 - t08:09:32z 2014 - 12 - 07 - t08:09:32z < p >我想添加到大卫的优秀的答案。< / p >

Your premise is that there are "mountains before erosion" is not exactly accurate. Mountains, in the sense that think of them (local elevated regions above their surroundings, e.g. Mont Blanc) form because of erosion. In that case, mountains without erosion would simply not be mountains. Note that there can be two kinds of erosion: physical weathering and chemical weathering. A bit more about it in //www.hoelymoley.com/a/2306/725

Let's take at look some examples:

The Tibetan plateau is elevated because of the collision of two continental lithospheric plates. If you look at the topography, you will see that areas that are not nearby any serious elevation differences are not that jagged, for example in the center north area.

An example from the Grand Canyon. Looking down from the Colorado river, I'm pretty sure that you will agree the it's a mountain, and a jagged one. But other than that, there is nothing. It's a flat plateau. The Colorado plateau is very high in elevation, but without erosion it simply doesn't look like a mountain at all.

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/2122/-/6582 # 6582 3 戈登斯坦格的回答有什么山的照片没有显著侵蚀地球上(或其他) 戈登斯坦格 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/4507 2015 - 09 - 22 - t04:25:41z 2015 - 09 - 22 - t04:25:41z < p >这是一个问题,< em > < / em >的侵蚀。所有山脉从那一刻开始侵蚀这造山运动的开始。侵蚀停止或减缓极小的数量在山上保护一个巨大的冰的厚度,在格陵兰岛和南极。一旦冰开始融化,侵蚀率将恢复正常。地外表面的侵蚀率通常比地球上要慢得多,和不同类型的。机制包括热膨胀和收缩,风消融(如果有任何形式的氛围),融化,火流星影响微小陨石,摇滚潮汐,微分引力效应。没有宇宙的一部分是完全不受侵蚀。< / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/2122/-/6583 # 6583 7 答案由f。索普有山的照片没有明显的侵蚀地球上(或其他) f.thorpe //www.hoelymoley.com/users/543 2015 - 09 - 22 - t05:02:16z 2015 - 09 - 22 - t05:02:16z < p >新鲜盾圆顶状的火山可能会感兴趣的。< / p >

enter image description here

Shield volcanoes on Venus - The Pancake Domes
enter image description here

Shield volcanoes on Earth - The Galapagos Islands enter image description here

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/2122/-/10329 # 10329 3 把手抓扒者回答的有山的照片没有显著侵蚀地球上(或其他) 旋钮刮子 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/7333 2017 - 05 - 08 - t04:58:04z 2017 - 05 - 08 - t04:58:04z < blockquote > < p >或者,有地球上的山脉,(无论什么原因)侵蚀并没有起到了很大的作用在塑造他们迄今为止,因此,类似于uneroded山脉一个会发现在一个真空的世界吗?< / p > < /引用> < p >整个西藏高原山脉未曝光的侵蚀。了大陆,只需要一点点雨雪让球滚起来。同样适用于科罗拉多高原,尽管在一些小的部分中,水分已雕刻一些可能最终成为山区的峡谷和山谷。< / p > < p >基本上是没有差别,视觉上,平坦的平原和uneroded山脉之间。< / p >
Baidu
map