行星可以被温室效应加热温度高于由其事件和净吸收,外部辐射峰值?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 04 - 05 - t04:34:17z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/22362 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/22362 2 行星可以被温室效应加热温度高于由其事件和净吸收,外部辐射峰值? 理查德·r·Forberg //www.hoelymoley.com/users/22690 2021 - 06 - 08 - t03:56:22z 2021 - 06 - 15 - t00:05:52z < p >在温室效应,引起的各种大气气体(例如,2 H <子> < /订阅> O,有限公司<子> 2 < /订阅>,CH 4 < /订阅>,<子>等),作为绝缘层,只有阻碍热量从地球的逃逸,现在看来,上述声明是正确的。Yet many commentaries on climate change seem to allow for the potential of much greater heating due to "run-away" feedback effects.

Such "run-away" heating scenarios do seem to violate the Stephan-Boltzman Law, and the general laws of thermodynamics, even after allowing for the "back-radiation", that effectively provides the "insulation" that slows the escape of the long-wave (i.e., infrared) radiation. While "greenhouse" gas insulation is the colder body (in daytime), it cannot do a net transfer heat to the plant's surface, which is the hotter body. At night time, however, the greenhouse gas may be the hotter body -- for a while -- and thus transfer some heat back to surface, before morning sun rise. This is how I see it. Is that wrong?

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/22362/-/22373 # 22373 1 帕维尔回答的一个星球可以加热的温室效应温度高于由其事件和净吸收,外部辐射峰值? 帕维尔 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/18158 2021 - 06 - 11 - t02:44:47z 2021 - 06 - 15 - t00:05:52z < p >我们将金星作为典范的例子失控的温室效应。< / p > < p >首先,让我们谈谈日夜变化。在表面水平几乎没有改变金星的反照率为0.77,即大气折射光的77%。比较这个地球的反照率为0.3。所以在金星的大气层的总体能量平衡来自太阳的热量扮演一个很小的角色,大部分只会影响大气的上层。< / p > < p >,甚至光不是立即反射回来主要是被大气吸收,因此,日夜温度变化几乎是不存在的。低层大气有大约相同的温度在白天还是晚上,在赤道或杆。< / p > < p >同时,像大多数的类地行星金星继续生产主要是由于放射性元素的衰变热的地幔。这些热量替代丢失的金额从大气中进入太空。< / p > < p >是一个稳定的系统,结果真正唯一能影响它在这个阶段是随着时间的推移逐渐减少核衰变热。< / p > < p > <强>编辑:< /强>有一个很长时间的讨论,在评论中所以我想我会更新后更好地解释我的意思。< / p > < p >一颗行星的大气层是一个热力学系统,在金星的情况下似乎是在平衡状态,即系统中收到的热量等于热量损失空间主要通过红外辐射。< / p > < p >行星能量平衡的主要部分如下:传入的太阳辐射和地热的收入来源和损失主要是辐射。< / p > < p >地热也包括余热遗留行星的形成和额外的热量产生的放射性核素的衰变。在地球地热< a href = " https://se.copernicus.org/articles/1/5/2010/ " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >估计一些47 TW < / >估计大约有一半是来自于余热,一半——从放射性衰变。 I couldn't find any reliable sources for Venus, but due to similarities in composition it's reasonable to say that it would exhibit similar energy flux but due to lover volume it's likely to be around 40 TW.

So now the overall simplistic view at the components that result in constant atmospheric temperature of Venus:

  • Albedo of 0.77 limits the amount of solar radiation from an initial flux of $\approx 2601 W/m^2$ to only about $157 W/m^2$ enter link description here
  • Additional minor energy income comes from planet's interior as discussed above.
  • Finally, heat escapes primarily via IR radiation.
  • High density of atmosphere distributes energy more evenly.
Baidu
map