如果甲烷在大气中衰变为$\small\sf{CO_2}$,难道不应该有更多的$\small\sf{CO_2}$吗?-地江南体育网页版球科学堆栈交换江南电子竞技平台 最近30个来自www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 04 - 07 - t02:43:40z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/23505 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/23505 4 如果甲烷在大气中衰变为$\small\sf{CO_2}$,难道不应该有更多的$\small\sf{CO_2}$吗? 一些人 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/26397 2022 - 02年- 08 - t08:29:36z 2022 - 02 - 09 - t03:44:23z

我试图了解大气ppm数据,特别是围绕CH4如何衰变为CO2。< / p >

This data says 2017 CH4 is about 1850ppm, and 2017 CO2 is 402ppm increasing about 3ppm/year. (https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/daviz/atmospheric-concentration-of-carbon-dioxide-5)

I've also read that CH4 has a half-life in the atmosphere of about 9 years, decaying with the chemical equation CH4 + O2 → CO2 + H4

So if you'd expect methane's 1850ppm to decay to 925ppm over 9 years, that means you'd also expect to see an increase of 925ppm of CO2, or about 100ppm/yr just from methane decay. That'd be insanely high. But the data I linked earlier shows an increase of 3ppm.

So what am I missing in this analysis?

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/23505/if-methane-decays-to-small-sfco-2-in-the-atmosphere-shouldnt-there-be-muc/23506#23506 6 如果甲烷在大气中衰变为$\small\sf{CO_2}$,难道不应该有更多的$\small\sf{CO_2}$吗? 大卫Hammen //www.hoelymoley.com/users/239 2022 - 02年- 08 - t14:11:22z 2022 - 02年- 08 - t14:11:22z 所以我在这个分析中遗漏了什么?< / p >

The linked data says 2017 CH4 was about 1850 ppb, not 1850 ppm. Dividing parts per billion (ppb) by 1000 results in parts per million (ppm). In other words, the atmospheric methane concentration was about 1.850 ppm in 2017. Assuming an exponential decay with a half life of 9 years means that about 0.14 ppm $\left(1850*(1-2^{-1/9}\,)\right)$ of the 2.4 ppm increase in the 2017 to 2018 CO2 concentration was due to methane decomposition. That's a small but not insignificant portion of the increase.

Baidu
map