考虑到超铀元素的衰变产物,是世界上铀储量的增加或减少?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 08 - 12 - t17:56:08z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/23625 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/23625 10 考虑到超铀元素的衰变产物,是世界上铀储量的增加或减少? 》中 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/26564 2022 - 03 - 17 - t06:44:11z 2022 - 03 - 28 - t15:59:44z < p >我和我的一个朋友是一个环保主义者喜欢我但不喜欢核能,她告诉我,从长远来看这不是一个好的选择,因为铀衰变。当然这是一个荒谬的观点,因为u - 238的半衰期是数十亿年来衡量,但是我不能告诉她世界上外汇储备是否萎缩在地质时间尺度。看着许多衰变元素的u - 238,我相信可能有少数同位素衰变。我一定< em > < / em >为这些元素有一个名字我寻找,我不能找到他们。< / p > < p > <强>后续问题:< /强>给我们目前已知储量超铀元素的元素,又考虑到他们的衰变产物,最大的铀储量将在哪里,说,10 u - 238的半衰期?我几乎不能理解一个核素图,甚至不知道从哪里开始寻找这些元素的地图。< / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/23625/-/23626 # 23626 22 答案由Gimelist考虑超铀元素的衰变产物,是世界上铀储量的增加或减少? Gimelist //www.hoelymoley.com/users/725 2022 - 03 - 17 - t11:27:32z 2022 - 03 - 17 - t11:27:32z < p >让我们从简单的问题开始:< / p > < blockquote > < p >给我们目前已知储量超铀元素的元素,又考虑到他们的衰变产物,最大的铀储量将在哪里,说,10 u - 238的半衰期?我几乎不能理解一个核素图,甚至不知道从哪里开始寻找这些元素的地图。< / p >

10 half lives of U-238 will pass in around 45 billion years. We have only about 5 billion years before the sun starts expanding beyond Earth's orbit. Therefore, the answer to your question is "inside the sun".


Now, the main part of your question:

Of course this is a ridiculous argument because U-238's half-life is measured in billions of years

You are entirely correct. We can even calculate that. Let's ask Wolfram Alpha how much uranium will have decayed after 1000 years. This is the answer:

remaining fraction of number of particles | 99.9999845% = 0.999999845

So for all practical purposes, after one thousand years (!!), the amount of uranium in the Earth does not change (other than the uranium used for power generation).

I couldn't tell her whether or not the world's reserves were shrinking in a geologic time scale

First, note that the word "reserves" has a very specific meaning. You are probably asking simply about the quantity of uranium in the Earth. So yes, it is shrinking. The half-life of uranium is about 4.5 billion years, which happens to be the age of the earth. So the Earth currently has half of the uranium it had when it first formed.

I believe there may be a handful of isotopes that decay into it

Yes, Pu-242 will decay to U-238 with a half-life of 375000 years. Since we're more than 100 half-lives past the formation of the Earth, there is no Pu-242 left on Earth for all practical purposes. Statistically speaking, there might be a few atoms left hanging around since then, but don't put your bets on their decay for increasing the amount of U-238.

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/23625/-/23630 # 23630 2 答案由罗兰Pechtel考虑超铀元素的衰变产物,是世界上铀储量的增加或减少? 罗兰Pechtel //www.hoelymoley.com/users/1160 2022 - 03 - 18 - t05:30:15z 2022 - 03 - 18 - t05:30:15z < p >铀现在地球上总是下降(除非有大事件交付的影响,放射性物质将是我们最关心的问题。)是的,出现在一些铀衰变链,但唯一的天然铀衰变链是。< / p > < p >是的,你可以找到衰变链上市顶部有别的东西,但别的合成或最初来自铀。< / p > < p >如果你想看看你会发现地质时间尺度核能可以减少辐射。所有的放射性产生相当短,开采和使用的铀最终会显示为减少氡接触所有氡是由铀衰变。< / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/23625/-/23644 # 23644 0 答案由FluidCode考虑超铀元素的衰变产物,是世界上铀储量的增加或减少? FluidCode //www.hoelymoley.com/users/18774 2022 - 03 - 27 - t10:10:38z 2022 - 03 - 28 - t15:59:44z < p >这个问题本身是有缺陷的。< / p > < p >开始谈论核能,然后专注于u - 238。今天绝大多数核电站取决于u - 235这是罕见的。植物使用不同的技术一直受到技术和政治的问题。这就是政治压力,可能的情况是,我们将继续与当前压水式反应堆技术很长一段时间。江南登录网址app下载< / p > < p > u - 235以来也需要在其他类型的触发器核电站很可能最终转向重水或增殖反应堆可能开始的时候会太迟了。它仍将可能产生核能使用粒子加速器产生与u - 238中子束轰击铀,但成本高,建议设计从未超越画板。< / p > < p >所以,长期的问题是一种有限的资源枯竭早在衰退之前可以有任何影响。< / p >
Baidu
map