如何旋转地球核心的影响气候?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 08 - t21:18:28z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/24783 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/24783 7 如何旋转地球核心的影响气候? user28185 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/0 2023 - 01 - 24 t11:59:05z 2023 - 01 - 25 - t11:38:41z < p > < a href = " https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561 - 022 - 01112 - z.epdf?sharing_token=efokpjqdxd2xtxnkcczzmnrgn0jajwel9jnr3zotv0n n5ckh8szm_u5cefurtajryk - 7 - lhjo5k2v - 6 - 0 - f42k8qtqm3terzjvr7wlbtrcxbiqymqymi5ro0dbzxx3vfnw62n0w85vtf csmohz - - su6_tmnvbno_flhhacfj5hucvessl8wx_jkhwvtspt yn - 2 - hw1rq0u lbys6nd8cg%3d%3d& tracking_referrer = elpais.com”rel = " noreferrer " >最近的一篇论文发表在《自然》< / > sugests 60 - 70年核心旋转周期,它是说:< / p > < blockquote > < p >有趣的是,同样的数十年周期性也观察到地球的气候系统,特别是全球平均气温和海平面上升。< / p > < /引用> < p >断言引用< a href = " https://www.nature.com/articles/367723a0 " rel = " noreferrer " > < / >出版于1994年。< / p > < p >这是数十年气候周期气候学家之间广泛接受吗?它可能是由于其他原因比核心旋转在这项研究之前?< / p > < p >可以核心旋转影响的气候如何?< / p > <人力资源/ > < p >杨,Y。、歌曲、x(2023):“数十年变化的地球内核旋转!”《自然—地球科学》上。< a href = " https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561 - 022 - 01112 - z”rel = " noreferrer " > https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561 - 022 - 01112 - z < / > < / p > < p >施莱辛格,M。Ramankutty, n(1994)“全球气候系统的振荡周期为65 - 70年!”大自然367年,723 - 726。< a href = " https://doi.org/10.1038/367723a0 " rel = " noreferrer " > https://doi.org/10.1038/367723a0 < / > < / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/24783/-/24785 # 24785 6 回答大卫Hammen旋转地球的内核如何影响气候? 大卫Hammen //www.hoelymoley.com/users/239 2023 - 01 - 24 t13:58:56z 2023 - 01 - 25 - t11:38:41z < p >我有四件事要说关于:< / p > < ol > <李> < p >这篇文章太新。我不是说第一篇论文是错误的(这实际上是相当有趣的),但昨日公布,它太新的作为一切的基础。发表在同行评议的杂志上发表科学开始,而不是结束。等一等科学界确认或拒绝赔偿。李李< / p > < / > < > < p >这两个效应可能是完全无关的。李李< / p > < / > < > < p >,如果他们是相关的,你可能会混淆因果关系。可能是什么原因气候振荡反过来导致振荡在内核的旋转速度。李李< / p > < / > < > < p >什么是论文的作者问题报告已观察到的是一个小的微分旋转+地壳和地幔之间的内在核心。这可能是内核旋转更顺利比地壳地幔+。换句话说,他们看到转速的变化地壳地幔+。< / p > < /李> < / ol > < p >我们知道作为一个事实,即地球的自转速度逐渐放缓。 Scientists see this far in the past in tidal rhythmites locked in stone. More recent signs were ancient astronomers/astrologers (the two were the same "science" up to Kepler's time) who recorded solar eclipses at specific cities. Those solar eclipses would have happened elsewhere on the Earth if the Earth maintained a more or less constant rotation rate.

Thanks to atomic clocks and long baseline interferometry, scientists readily see seasonal changes in the Earth's rotation rate. Snow falls on the northern parts of the North Hemisphere in winter and melts in the summer. That represents transfers of angular momentum between the oceans, the cryosphere, and the crust. These variations are easy to see.

Precise measurements of the Earth's rotation rate also show what appears to be longer term oscillations in the Earth's rotation. It appears that there is a multidecadal oscillation in the Earth's rotation rate that is correlated with the 60 to 70 year Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO). Since very good data on the Earth's rotation only goes back 60 to 70 years, it's a not quite conclusive. The same goes for the AMO; very good meteorological data only goes back 100 years or so. The cause of the AMO is debated. The teleconnections between it and other climate observations are also debated. However, the AMO does appear to impact climate, and climate in turn appears to impact Earth rotation. (We know climate as a fact that impacts Earth rotation on a yearly basis.)

The Earth comprises multiple rotating parts: The atmosphere, the cryosphere, the oceans, the crust and mantle, the liquid outer core, and the solid inner core. These different parts exchange angular momentum with one another (and also with the Moon). Except for the seasonal variations and the long term secular transfer to the Moon, teasing out cause and effect in the variations of the Earth's rotation rate is a non-trivial exercise.

Baidu
map