为什么有不同符号的涡度方程?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 07 - t14:58:19z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/24929 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/24929 2 为什么有不同符号的涡度方程? MichaelW //www.hoelymoley.com/users/21047 2023 - 02年- 18 - t17:47:16z 2023 - 02年- 19 - t16:07:41z < p >我是一名学生在第一年气象。This time my question is not about a particular problem I have, but rather about teaching and learning: In a recent lecture on atmospheric dynamics we learned among other things the "vorticity equation": Its derivation was carried out starting from the horizontal momentum equations:

enter image description here

After taking the y derivative of the u equation and the x derivative of the v equation and subtracting them, we get a lot of terms, which were grouped together and partially cancel each other. After a struggling time, we end up finally in the vertical component $\zeta $ of the vorticity $\vec \omega $:

enter image description here

Note: the pictures of the equations above are taken from YouTube: AtmosphericDynamics Chapter04 Part02 VorticityEquation, but they were identical in the lecture (the derivation was skipped in the video).

Now I have found the following after my own search, whereby the derivation is a lot easier (see chapter 3.4.) of Vorticity, Circulation and Potential Vorticity.

(see 3.4)

enter image description here

This approach, using well know vector identities is independent of the coordinate system and gives to my surprise really the same result for $D \zeta/Dt$ although it looks totally different at the first sight (I ignore the friction term).

In Holton, a book which I like very much, the derivation is essentially the same as in our lecture: quite log and non-motivating, because so many partial derivative terms had to be arranged and grouped with each other to get the final result after doing some pages of simple but totally boring algebra. Contrary, the other derivation is not only shorter, but more elegant in terms of vector analysis and gives in only a few steps the generic result for all components of $\vec \omega$, not only for $\zeta$

Why this completely cumbersome derivation and not doing the same as in the other text, which is much more appealing and more general?

Is there a particular reason to write the final equation in a rather "nasty" way in local cartesian coordinates instead using the generic variant? It would have been more fun and more motivating to learn it in the other way around from the beginning.

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/24929/-/24930 # 24930 4 答案由Gemechu芬达Garuma为什么有不同符号的涡度方程吗? Gemechu芬达Garuma //www.hoelymoley.com/users/4877 2023 - 02年- 19 - t15:59:43z 2023 - 02年- 19 - t16:07:41z < p >第一个方程给出了向量的身份不习惯。这是当学生可能没有先进的向量代数的知识,例如,卷发,点和交叉产品,特征值和特征向量。第二个使用向量身份概念。而首先是给本科生课程,因为它不需要先进的向量代数的概念,第二个是给高层本科生和研究生类因为它需要先进的向量代数的概念。< / p >
Baidu
map