有谁知道更多关于上帝论者的特技,他们实验室最近的日期三叠纪煤碳和太圣海伦斯火山熔岩K-Ar -地球科学栈交流吗江南电子竞技平台江南体育网页版 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 26 - t18:29:26z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/24951 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/24951 2 有谁知道更多关于上帝论者的特技,他们实验室最近的日期三叠纪煤碳和太圣海伦斯火山熔岩K-Ar吗 戈登·劳斯 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/28550 2023 - 02年- 23 - t20:39:37z 2023 - 02 - 24 t02:11:29z < p >一个创世论者一直对我坚持放射性年代测定是无效的,因为有人约会1986从圣海伦火山熔岩流到250000年,他们有一个碳日期从悉尼盆地三叠纪煤33000年。< / p > < p >我试图解释这些结果可能是怎么形成的,当然我不知道这些创世论者使用方法。< / p > < p >看到讨论:< a href = " https://qr。ae / pr90Bs nofollow noreferrer“rel = > https://qr。ae/pr90Bs

The "gotcha" with the C14 is described here: https://answersingenesis.org/fossils/dating-dilemma-fossil-wood-in-ancient-sandstone/

Does anyone know more about what these idiots are up to, and able to give a better response to explain that these results are not scientific proof of anything except the inability of Creationists to apply correct methods.

I see the cleverness of the 'Gotcha', it takes advantage of notions of simplistic understanding of science. Trying to explain to lay-persons the intricacies of these methods is difficult, and I am out of date myself with my geology!

 //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/24951/-/24952 # 24952 2 回答大卫Hammen有人知道更多关于上帝论者的特技,他们实验室最近的日期三叠纪煤碳和Mt与K-Ar圣海伦斯火山熔岩 大卫Hammen //www.hoelymoley.com/users/239 2023 - 02年- 23 - t22:36:21z 2023 - 02 - 24 t02:11:29z < p >有许多问题与碳14测定有关。两个关键问题:< / p > < ul > <李>碳14日期不能用于任何年龄超过5万岁。碳14的半衰期约为5730年。这短的半衰期是非常有用的约会对象2万岁或更年轻。试图用碳14测定日期石油或煤炭?无用的。试图用碳14的约会对象由其他可靠的估计将有2.25亿岁?无用的。李李< / > < >样本可以污染,原位,在收集过程中,或者在实验室里。这是特别的问题大概是老样本。试图用碳14测定样本2.25亿岁不能说怀疑对象是2.25亿岁。 It might however say the object is 33 thousand years old. The sample in question was in an easily contaminated sandstone deposit. It was beyond stupid to send that sample for carbon-14 dating.

Young earth creationists know these points and know they are lying, but that doesn't stop them from doing so. Their religion is at stake.
Baidu
map