< p >你是正确的,倾斜角度变化很大程度上取决于你选择的轮廓。相比人工地图设计,为学生传授基本的构造地质学(比如你添加到你的问题),自然地图很少“好和友好”计算。< / p > < p >有几种原因:< / p > < ol > <李>倾角实际上可能有所不同。在人工地图,床通常表格而不是折叠(除非这是一个折叠运动)。天然岩石很少完全平面和表格,其厚度也不同。这可以导致不同的下降顶部和底部的床上在同一位置。李李< / > < >地图通常不画与倾角的计算。联系人是基于有限的暴露可以映射的地质学家。岩石单元之间的联系可能是被植被、岩屑、土壤甚至房屋和道路。地图是dip-calculation友好是耗费时间,如果可能的话。李李< / > < >也取决于地形轮廓的准确性。正如你可能知道的,你必须考虑到海拔在这些计算。即使是准确的轮廓,地形可能不准确或无法正常间隔。 I can testify from my own experience that the topographic map that was available to me of this area: seems like we are walking on a somewhat planar area without any steep slopes and only several meters of variability in elevation. So what are your options? Some maps already have dip measurements built into them, thanks to the detailed work of the mapping geologist. If not, some structural maps of the same area may be available from the local geological survey/society. If you insist in making your own calculations, and the bed is rather planar, you can try to use a wider area for calculation (let's say 1 km instead of 100 m). You can try to take many measurements over an area and make a histogram of the measurements, or maybe examine the spatial distribution.