最终将海洋侵蚀土地吗?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 10 - t08:18:58z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/4876 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/4876 14 最终将海洋侵蚀土地吗? 斯图尔特 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/2908 2015 - 05 - 16 - t17:00:34z 2022 - 03 - 30 - t21:10:24z < p >好像地球的能量最低的状态是没有任何高山和给予足够的时间,海洋将侵蚀所有土地。本质上这是一个论点像熵。和我的意思是在< em > < / em >未来,一旦构造活动停止。< / p > < p >这是如此,如果是这样可能要花多长时间?如果不是这样,为什么不呢? < / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/4876/-/4952 # 4952 2 答案由user180146最终将海洋侵蚀土地吗? user180146 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/2954 2015 - 06 - 04 - t10:32:20z 2015 - 06 - 04 - t22:31:06z < p >大陆是由不同的、更轻的材料比海洋和大陆和大洋地幔“浮动”。大陆也比海洋更厚所以侵蚀不仅需要照顾~ 5公里的海拔,但也削弱了大陆根(可以几个10公里,直到大陆地壳的实际上是比海洋地壳今天稍薄。< / p > < p >然而构造不是唯一来源的地形可以很容易地看到如果我们看看火星,热点已经创造了一个巨大的山构造不活跃的星球上。< / p > < p >如果你想最终地形自由星球需要关闭所有可能的地幔。< / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/4876/-/5121 # 5121 2 看你回答的最终将海洋侵蚀土地吗? 看到你 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/3126 2015 - 07 - 04 - t04:22:04z 2015 - 07 - 04 - t04:22:04z < p >我认为,板块构造的主要原因是他们在地球表面高程。但我要说清楚,海洋是没有土地的主要eroders——自来水在陆地上(从雨和雪)。你是正确的假设地球冷却,板块构造将消退,侵蚀的速度将克服由于板块构造的速度提升。< / p > < p >至于估算大约需要多长时间,我不希望妄加猜测。地球已经强大了几十亿年,它可能有一个几十亿年了。< / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/4876/-/23659 # 23659 1 回答彼得•简颂最终将海洋侵蚀土地吗? 彼得很 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/81 2022 - 03 - 30 - t21:08:57z 2022 - 03 - 30 - t21:08:57z < p >你的问题部分是有缺陷的,因为它不是海洋侵蚀大洲。取而代之的是集体称为剥蚀侵蚀,所有进程的总和inclusing风化、斜率流程和河流过程减少地形的大洲。< / p > < p >水平,这些过程往往将海洋的水平,确定为基础水平。说几个过程可能侵蚀基面以下的水平。深风化可能对低于这一水平,但可能只有几十米。冰川过程绝对可以侵蚀公里低于海平面,但这是局部的山谷(可能在基岩断裂区)形成峡湾,可能被侵蚀到1海平面以下1.5公里。< / p > < p >添加到这种情况,我们必须考虑到海平面波动取决于海洋盆地realtive大洲的分布。新海底相对高海拔相比老海底由于密度的差异。水也可以积累在陆地上冷时期可以导致海平面变化。因此,海平面还远未通过时间常数。< / p >

An implication of the question is what will happen in the future. I will assume the earths interior will cool with time chaning the continental drifting. With slowing drifting mountain building will decrease so that denudation will likely be dominating. A problem here is that we probably need to consider loss of atmosphere and other issues that we do not know much about. There are indictions from Mars that water has been more abundant in teh past yet the topography on Mars is significant because the erosional processes have lost their poser as loss of water may have been critical.

So what will happen in the futiure depends on how tectonic and atmospheric processes change in the distant future due to changes or development in both the earth's interior and the atmosphere in terms of water content (water being a critical componete in both weathering of rocks abnd transport of material in topgraphic terrain).

To conclude, the question is much larger than can first be thought and we need to consider large time frames in which many of existing processes and systems will drastically change. So to provide a time frame is very difficult and essentially pointless.

Baidu
map