最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 07 - t06:42:17z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/6783 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/6783 9 吉米 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/4658 2015 - 10 - 25 - t15:02:34z 2015 - 10 - 26 - t10:47:37z

< p >有没有的例子现在完全内陆前河口或河口大陆碰撞后变得如此?作为一个例子,考虑关闭印度和欧亚板块之间的海洋,今天有没有证据,例如喜马拉雅山,古老的河口或河口现在被困在两大洲的汇聚边界?今天作为推论有河流含有的证据相反的流向过去,结果上面的吗?这种情况下,如果他们存在,将会是很有趣的镜子来大陆裂谷的想法对河道水流逆转的贡献(我想亚马逊河的惊人的发现前的东西流之前南美泥盆纪远离非洲:< a href = " http://www.livescience.com/4253-amazon-river-flowed-ancient-times.html " rel =“nofollow”> http://www.livescience.com/4253-amazon-river-flowed-ancient-times.html < / >)。< / p > < p >参考:< a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_collision " rel =“nofollow”>大陆碰撞< / > < a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_drift " rel =“nofollow”>大陆漂移< / > < / p >

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/6783/-/6789 # 6789 2 戈登斯坦格 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/4507 2015 - 10 - 26 - t09:08:12z 2015 - 10 - 26 - t10:47:37z

< p >肯定有河口或河口proto-Himalayas的河流流进最后撤退的新特提斯洋主体阶段。这些河流由许多小河流和westward-flowing Proto-Ganges本身,而把Siwalik形成目前形成了较小的喜马拉雅山脉。最南端的“软”,盐和胡椒的砂岩,约2500米,毗邻印度平原。然而,几乎是一无所有的可辨认的河口沉积结构。都是压缩过的,折叠、叠瓦状逆掩断层和受到不同程度的成岩作用和骨折。大部分的沉积物是蜿蜒的滩涂、砂质沉积和限制浅海洋沉积物中,有一些相似之处“试管”环境的欧洲古老的红色砂岩。< / p > < p >的第二个问题,你提到的古地中海的海洋的关闭导致Indian-Tibetan碰撞表明你已经怀疑(正确地),恒河是一个很好的例子。源头最初是在中国西南部,它最初向西流动的脚proto-Himalayas(现在的高喜马拉雅山脉)和到印度洋附近的地方现在在巴基斯坦印度河流域。作为大陆碰撞的进展有up-warping大陆现在的印度喜马偕尔邦地区。现在逆转恒河流域,向东流动。 This has important modern implications, as it was the originally westward-flowing Ganges that brought arsenic from the marine Tethyan sediments of western China, and which is now the source of the arsenic groundwater problem over much of Bangladesh and adjacent areas. See also my paper: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10653-005-7102-9 But don't pay the exorbitant price! - I can send you the original text for free! :-)

map