如何准确的叠加定律吗?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 05 - 24 - t04:29:06z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/6788 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/6788 8 如何准确的叠加定律吗? user4699 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/4699 2015 - 10 - 26 - t05:19:30z 2015 - 10 - 27 - t08:50:31z < p >最近我开始理性的科学的细节更感兴趣(…被上帝论者的朋友)经常挑战对他们其中一个特创论者的理论我遇到的是叠加定律——即声称层岩石形成的表层以下的底部——可以伪造的。他们提到的一些特创论者实验层形成“横向”和使用它作为一个参数来“证明”,地球不需要几百万年的历史。< / p > < p >现在我不想从事神学讨论,但我不知道如何准确的叠加定律。大多数的文章我读过称它为地质——即公理假设的东西,而不是证明。同时我意识到,这是一个“第一级大局公理”,每个人都知道的事实,在特殊情况下细节有点模糊,但看着整个世界是正确的“经常”,使它的公理来简化理论开始地质学家。< / p > < p >因此我的问题是:在全球范围内,重要的是如何偏离法律的叠加地球地层的结构吗?你会说不到1%的世界任何明显的偏离法律?< / p > < p >我道歉任何术语我可能误解。< / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/6788/-/6790 # 6790 9 答案由彼得·简颂叠加定律有多准确呢? 彼得很 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/81 2015 - 10 - 26 - t17:05:56z 2015 - 10 - 26 - t17:05:56z < p >原则并不适用于所有材料在地球上观察到我们主要关心的是沉积物和岩石形成沉淀物。由于重力沉降过程是由谷物结算上别人,没有可能改变,没有添加额外的流程。所以从这个角度来看,这个原则是100%的情况下是适用的。< / p > < p >当然老材料覆盖的情况下,您会发现年轻。在这种情况下已经有额外的部队在行动(自然介意你)。例如可能的入侵(岩浆)被注入固体岩石因此完全改变年龄老序列。也可能对地壳运动(构造)折叠的基石和推力部分基岩为叠加其他部分因此创建情况似乎年轻的岩石undelie老。也可能对沉积物幻灯片或移动下坡的这样一个反向或至少干扰序列建立了时代。我可以继续< em >无限< / em >。< / p > < p >很多可能性存在获得这种情况下总有合理的解释涉及post-sedimentary流程。 To correctly interprete observations, one has to have gained full understanding of the geological setting and history as well as physical processes. It is not generally wise to look at an outcrop or cut and create a larger scale interpretation without such background knowledge.

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/6788/-/6794 # 6794 5 答案由戈登斯坦格叠加定律有多准确呢? 戈登斯坦格 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/4507 2015 - 10 - 27 - t06:11:06z 2015 - 10 - 27 - t06:11:06z < p >彼得正确响应,沉积岩叠加的原则几乎是水密除外构造叠加。后者可以重复沉积序列,推翻它,或者早些时候逆掩断层序列。有许多可能的几何图形,创造论者往往歪曲。叠加的原则不是一个假设。这是一个逻辑推理,通过实地观察反复验证。< / p >

Whilst I note that the questioner doesn't want to get into discussion over creationism, as an Earth scientist who has studied creationist literature for decades, I must warn all readers that creationist literature, as it pertains to the Earth Sciences, is replete with misconceptions, distortions, quotations out of context, cherry-picking of data to give false impressions, and willful disregard of contrary evidence. Therefore, be very careful what you read, and check it out against genuine science!

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/6788/-/6796 # 6796 5 答案由Gimelist叠加定律有多准确呢? Gimelist //www.hoelymoley.com/users/725 2015 - 10 - 27 - t08:50:31z 2015 - 10 - 27 - t08:50:31z < p >这是另一个例子,叠加优惠的法则。请注意这是一个自然的过程:陨石撞击。< / p >

A meteorite impact will excavate material from the bottom, and deposit it above the crater rims. Here's how:

enter image description here

This will result in something that looks like this:

enter image description here

Source for both images is http://www.lpi.usra.edu/exploration/education/hsResearch/crateringLab/lab/ - see that website for full copyright info and more in depth explanations.

A very famous example of this inverted stratigraphy is Meteor Crater, AZ.

Baidu
map