最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 10 - t20:53:03z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/683 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/683 12 Poomrokc 3年 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/132 2014 - 05 - 01 - t14:48:11z 2021 - 05 - 17 - t20:41:23z

< p >是珠穆朗玛峰每年成为高或短?由多少?< / p > < p >我想解释的板块运动,如果可能的话。< / p > < p > < img src = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/3q0LJ.jpg " alt = "在这里输入图像描述" >来源:IamKatieHoffman.com < / p >

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/683/-/685 # 685 17 理查德。 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/330 2014 - 05 - 01 - t16:02:01z 2014 - 05 - 01 - t16:07:58z

< p > < a href = " http://www.nationalgeographic.com/features/99/everest/roof_content.html " > < / >一个调查显示使用GPS安装在高原在峰会上,珠穆朗玛峰每年增加身高约4毫米。< / p > < p >板块构造,< a href = " http://www.thetech.org/exhibits/online/everest/about/platetectonics.htm " >这个网站< / >描述很简单:< / p > < blockquote > < p >就像一辆车与一辆大货车迎头撞,起皱的发生在两大洲,其结果是喜马拉雅山的创建。尽管印度大幅放缓的向北漂移与初始碰撞,两大洲继续收敛在印度幻灯片在亚洲。< / p > < /引用>

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/683/-/695 # 695 7 文学士 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/342 2014 - 05 - 01 - t20:58:34z 2014 - 05 - 01 - t20:58:34z

< p >短而甜蜜,是的,它是越来越高。< p >它是越来越高,因为-欧亚板块继续碰撞。我读过,它的高度增加的数量每年显然有些犹豫不决,有消息说这是增长了多达30”每年,当别人说每年只有4毫米。这里有两个链接,我觉得相当的信息,和在那里我获得了我的大部分信息。注:可爱的照片:http://www.extremescience.com/everest.htm) < a href = " http://www.extremescience.com/everest.htm " > < / > < p > < a href = " http://www.nationalgeographic.com/features/99/everest/roof_start.html " > http://www.nationalgeographic.com/features/99/everest/roof_start.html < / > < / p >

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/683/-/6717 # 6717 5 戈登斯坦格 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/4507 2015 - 10 - 13 - t13:55:45z 2015 - 10 - 13 - t15:51:43z

< p >这个问题似乎认为山海拔的增加或减少是一致的和统一的,它不是。印度与西藏板块会聚在NNE-SSW方向总体的意思是每年26至36毫米的速度。然而,大多数时候这收敛都是静态应变能,释放弹性回跳在罕见的地震。此外,珠穆朗玛峰是北部边界的碰撞区。大部分的变形和应变能吸收进一步南部一叠瓦构造复杂的浅角over-thrusts西藏的印度板块。如果过去尼泊尔地震的话,融合的垂直分量约三分之一。即每年约8 - 12毫米,其中我们可以假设至少3/4发生变形进一步南部。树叶最大意味着隆起在珠穆朗玛峰每年6 - 9毫米,有概率在现实中有点少。< / p > < p >卫星测量没有足够长的时间进行我们得到一个长期处理提升利率。也有复杂的因素:< / p > < ol > <李>山质量的大小有可能均衡运动缓慢弯曲引起的地壳与上地幔“软”。

Earthquakes can both raise and lower the mountain according to the geometry of motion. In the last earthquake Kathmandu rose by a metre, but Everest fell by several centimeters. There is no guarantee that the next quake will do the same. A quake further south in the Himalayas is likely to cause back-tilting (and hence lowering) of the Everest massif, whereas a quake with an epicenter close to Everest could raise it by several metres.

The summit is covered by a variable thickness of snow, typically from 1 to 4 metres, so there is a discrepancy between the height of the actual summit (with snow) and the bare rock.

map