水下“风车”的影响是什么?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 09 - t08:07:50z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/7149 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/7149 5 水下“风车”的影响是什么? arkaia //www.hoelymoley.com/users/111 2015 - 12 - 30 - t01:30:11z 2015 - 12 - 31 - t16:06:56z < p >最早期的潮汐能发电机的例子使用< a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_barrage " rel =“nofollow”> < / >海法(咒骂)发电(< a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rance_Tidal_Power_Station " rel =“nofollow”> La兰斯< / > < a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kislaya_Guba_Tidal_Power_Station " rel =“nofollow”> Kislaya Guba < / >、< a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annapolis_Royal_Generating_Station " rel =“nofollow”>安纳波利斯皇家< / >)。与此同时,很多新项目使用旋转叶片在潮汐流中(如风车叶片),导致一个看起来像一个水下风电场安装。这样的项目的例子有:< a href = " http://fundyforce。ca / rel =“nofollow”< / > >力量(芬迪海洋能源研究中心),< a href = " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaGen " rel =“nofollow”> SeaGen < / >、< a href = " http://www.tidalstream.co.uk/ " rel =“nofollow”> TidalStream < / >…< / p > < p >虽然一些人声称,这些新系统的环境影响不太严重,但事实是,潮流技术是相对较新,已应用于只有少数网站。江南登录网址app下载环境影响似乎是基于假设,建模和简化的实验,但我的问题是:< / p > < ul > <李>这些环境影响是什么?李李< / > < >多少当地水流影响这些结构吗?< /李> < / ul > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/7149/-/7150 # 7150 6 半日西蒙回答的水下“风车”的影响是什么? 半日西蒙 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/39 2015 - 12 - 30 - t08:14:11z 2015 - 12 - 30 - t08:14:11z < p >当你注意到,这种技术是新的,而且到目前为止,江南登录网址app下载只有少量的实验潮汐能源转换器(tec)部署。出于这个原因,没有可能的测量,所以正如你提到的,估计是基于预测的模型或其他手段。< / p > < p >先回答第二个问题——多少电流的影响取决于你删除多少的能量。因为tec的目的是消除能源流,必须有一些对电流的影响。Garrett & Cummins (2005) built a simple analytic model of a channel between two large basins (which reflects many tidal energy scenarios) and showed that if all other considerations (e.g. navigation, engineering practicality) are ignored then the maximum power that may be extracted from the channel is obtained when its flow rate is reduced by approximately two thirds. However, this scenario is unlikely to ever be obtained, and the real limit on energy extraction at a given site (if not an economic limit) will probably be determined by what level of environmental effects are deemed to be acceptable. The relationship between power extracted and effect on the flow is not a simple one, and in most cases a significant proportion of the available power could be obtained with a relatively small change to the local currents.

A number of modelling studies have been made of more realistic scenarios for early deployment (e.g. Admadien et al 2012). These typically predict local changes to current speeds of up to 30%, which fade after a few km. Typically there is a decrease in the flow speed in line with the TECs, and an increase to either side of the farm/array, as some of the flow diverts around the added impedence. Effects on residual velocity (i.e. that which is left in the long term when the tidal cycles are averaged out over a period of time), which is relevant to sediment transport processes, are predicted up to at least 15km away.

Some baroclinic modelling (Yang & Wang 2013) has suggested increased mixing, and thus decreased stratification, as a result of the turbulence introduced by TECs. It is also conceivable that in other scenarios, stratification might be increased as a result of reduced flow speeds.

Physical effects, then, are likely to include direct effects on current speed, sediment, and stratification.

The obvious possible biological effect is from collisions. This is not my field, but as I understand it no effect is likely on small fish populations from collisions, although individuals may be affected. Collision risk for large animals (e.g. sharks and marine mammals) and for diving birds is a topic of active research, and is likely (especially for mammals) to depend on their behaviour around the devices. No large animal collisions have been reported on any of the prototypes undergoing testing so far.

A good review of possible effects on benthic organisms is provided by Shields et al (2011). These may include,

  • Direct disruption of seabed habitats by physical interference, e.g. from moorings
  • Disruption of ecological niches: Some organisms have evolved to survive in areas where others cannot - e.g. high current speed environments. Changes in seabed conditions, e.g. from greater or lesser current speeds, may cause them to be out-competed by other species that can then settle there.
  • Similarly, changes to sediment distribution represent changes to seabed habitats.
  • Alteration of flow patterns could have implications for species with a dispersive juvenile stage (e.g. larvae that rely on currents to spread) or those that rely on current flow for nutrient or waste transport.
Baidu
map