最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 04 - 04 - t16:03:02z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/7754 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/7754 5 b .粘土Shannon-B。乌鸦乌鸦 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/3166 2016 - 03 - 28 - t17:46:42z 2018 - 11 - 05 - t21:07:46z

< p >我相信接受理论对亚利桑那州的大峡谷的形成是由科罗拉多河侵蚀流经该地区数百万年来是力量在起作用。< / p > < p >账户大规模的洪水已经传递到世界各地不同的民族,甚至在内陆地区。大峡谷实际上已经形成了这样一个灾难性的洪水吗?< / p > < p >在这两种情况下,假定大量的水形成了巨大的鸿沟;主要的区别是:在转换发生了多少时间?< / p > < p >如果全球泛滥被接受作为一个可能性,是大峡谷的条件和外观符合这样一个起源? < / p >

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/7754/-/7758 # 7758 14 Gimelist //www.hoelymoley.com/users/725 2016 - 03 - 29 - t04:48:38z 2016 - 12 - 30 - t02:16:02z

< p > tl;博士:<强> < /强>。< / p > < p >长答:< / p > < p >首先,别人在评论中提到的一样,你会需要一些物理机制来带很多水,蒸发,然后把它在一个大峡谷是现在的地方。这并不会发生,因为物理的东西。如果有某些特殊事件可能造成的,我们会得到更多的证据从大峡谷。< / p > < p >但假设,以某种方式,通过一些魔法或act-of-higher-being,极其大量的水倒在科罗拉多高原。又会是什么样呢?李> < / p > < ol > <大量岩移出高原形成了峡谷必须去某个地方。它会去那里很暴力,巨石,不规则的企业集团和整个混乱的混地质学。然而,当你看到沿着科罗拉多河下游,你看不到这些东西。当你看到在加利福尼亚湾(我们很清楚因为石油勘探),你看不出这个东西。 Instead you see very nice sandstones, shales, marls, clays, etc. Definitely stuff that should not be there if there was a huge flood. Furthermore, those sedimentary rocks are interbedded with volcanic rocks and limestones. If this was a sudden event, all of this could not be there.

The Colorado river is meandering. If it was a huge sudden flood you would not get this morphology.

So far I was talking about lack of evidence. There is also some direct evidence for the incision rate of the Grand Canyon. Using a plethora of of scientific methods, such as radioactive isotope dating, cosmogenic dating, thermoluminescence, etc., it's possible to directly get a time when a certain thing happened (depending on the method). This allows us to know exactly when a certain rock formed, exposed, eroded (again, depending on the method). Using these scientific methods allowed us to infer that the Grand Canyon formed in the last several few million years, at an incision rate of a few dozen to a few hundred metres per one million year. The value depends on the exact location in the Grand Canyon and also on which research group you're asking. But whether the argument is about if it's 100 or 200 metres per million years is irrelevant for this discussion - it invalidates any suggestion that it formed in one sudden magical act of flood.

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/7754/-/7789 # 7789 8 戈登斯坦格 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/4507 2016 - 04 - 04 - t16:50:35z 2016 - 04 - 04 - t16:50:35z

< p >除了上述有蜿蜒客栈的大峡谷液压的最低能量流配置的结果。这都限制了放电率的可能——水文排放在正常范围内。此外在大峡谷有几个地方有明确的证据被熔岩流堵塞,超过13火山事件。这些火山岩K-Ar约会不同的年龄段在过去的几百万年,与每一个熔岩大坝从10000年到20000年的侵蚀。见,例如< a href = " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC21407/ " rel = " noreferrer " > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC21407/ < / >和其他几个这方面的书籍和论文。< / p >

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/7754/-/15507 # 15507 1 罗伯·格里尔 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/14224 2018 - 11 - 05 - t21:07:46z 2018 - 11 - 05 - t21:07:46z

< p > < em > < / em >证据,至少部分的侵蚀在大峡谷是由流出熔岩大坝的洪水造成的失败。< a href = " https://www.gcrg.org/bqr/18-1/lava.html " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > https://www.gcrg.org/bqr/18-1/lava.html < / > < / p > < p >, < em > < / em >的人猜测冰川湖流出洪水从科罗拉多州西部的冰川在最后一个冰河时代结束了。需要更多的研究来证明或反驳。< / p >

map