我们改变地球的气候与全球变暖吗?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 09 - t01:14:33z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/8516 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/8516 4 我们改变地球的气候与全球变暖吗? 蒂莫西 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/4846 2016 - 08 - 05 - t17:15:49z 2016 - 10 - 24 - t18:03:24z < p >我认为当空气升温,从地面辐射加热方式更有助于在海拔300多米的地方比空气对流热量从地面。< / p > < p >我也认为直接辐射冷却的空气更有助于冷却空气离地面300多米比从地面传导。我不知道空气高度可以这么快热身和降温只要从地面传导。< / p > < p >如果这些假设是真的,确实我们的二氧化碳释放到空气中加快从地面吸收的辐射,辐射冷却的空气在晚上的空气,因为二氧化碳吸收红外线比空气? < / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/8516/-/8937 # 8937 3 回答的特雷弗·j·史密斯为我们改变地球的气候与全球变暖吗? 特雷弗·j·史密斯 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/5536 2016 - 10 - 22 - t14:37:07z 2016 - 10 - 22 - t14:37:07z < p >我想简单的回答你的问题是“是”。进入细节,这是一个更复杂的问题。< / p >

I can't speak to the specific RF and atmospheric interactions, but the changes to weather patterns and long-term climatic anomalies from climate change have been well established by climatologists. From my understanding, the issue with focusing specifically on land-atmospheric interactions at one altitude in the lower troposphere is that topography, land/water cover, latitude and existing weather patterns will have a more dominant effect and it'll be effectively impossible to determine changes based solely on RF anomaly.

For more info, it might make more sense to look over the IPCC AR5 Working Group 1 Technical Summary Report. Chapters TS.2 and TS.4 would probably have some specifics that could help clarify things.

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/8516/-/8951 # 8951 7 由kingledion回答我们改变地球的气候与全球变暖吗? kingledion //www.hoelymoley.com/users/6703 2016 - 10 - 24 - t17:33:49z 2016 - 10 - 24 - t17:33:49z < p >首先,关于你的假设,这是一个图形从< a href = " http://www.goes-r.gov/users/comet/tropical/textbook_2nd_edition/print_1.htm " rel = " noreferrer " >这个在线教科书< / >。< / p > < p > < a href = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/C4lyS.jpg " rel = " noreferrer " > < img src = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/C4lyS.jpg " alt = "在这里输入图像描述" > < / > < / p > < p >正如你所看到的,你的第一个假设是正确的,表面辐射比上升暖气流更重要得多。你的第二个假设也是正确的,“辐射”和“大气”发出的流是重要的,但通过地面从空气中吸收热量并没有出现在这张图。所以传导传热从空中到地面是微不足道的。这< / p > < p > < a href = " http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/EnergyBalance/page7.php " rel = " noreferrer " > < / >页给一些好的背景对二氧化碳导致全球变暖,就像你说的,它是由于红外辐射的吸收来自地面和空气。具体来说,公司_2吸收红外波长美元能“逃避”吸收水蒸气(主要的温室气体)在12 - 15 \μm,美元,下图所示。< / p >

enter image description here

With more thermal radiation absorbed in the air, less escapes into space, and the net energy balance of Earth is positive which results in a slow and steady warming.

Baidu
map