将高效碳sequestrion产生立即的结果在全球气温?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学堆江南电子竞技平台栈交换 最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 07 - t07:09:03z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/question/8952 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/8952 5 将高效碳sequestrion产生立即的结果在全球气温? 西德尼 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/5673 2016 - 10 - 24 - t17:38:37z 2016 - 10 - 26 - t12:10:30z < p >所以,想象一个新技术,介绍了非常江南登录网址app下载有效的碳封存,让说的~ 90%的碳在空气处理和处理每分钟10吨天然气(这些数字可以敷衍了事,基本要点是极端碳封存,将在全球范围内可见在很短的时间顺序,不到十年左右)。< / p > < p >地球正在变暖,这是明显的在我们长季节春季/秋季,冬季短。如果我们使用上述mcguffin迅速移除大气中的二氧化碳,将季节相对较快地恢复到工业化前的水平,或地球会被大量需要的太阳能辐射之前我们开始看到正常季节? < / p > //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/8952/-/8953 # 8953 9 答案由kingledion将高效碳sequestrion全球气温产生立即的结果? kingledion //www.hoelymoley.com/users/6703 2016 - 10 - 24 - t20:13:32z 2016 - 10 - 26 - t12:10:30z < p >碳之间的延迟时间的问题除了大气和最大变暖的结果,可能是很分裂的。我曾听到估计大约50年,但最近的工作我能找到(免费)< a href = " http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/9/12/124002; jsessionid = 669174 b25b26a1c276408ea23540ac3e.c4.iopscience.cld.iop.org " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " >表明< / > 10年是正确的,有关论文的图1是最好的图形的证据。这10年的反应是一次性注入的二氧化碳,所以我们不能假设它会工作相同的一次性去除碳,但现在我们可以与这个数字。< / p >

enter image description here

So, looking at Figure 1, if we started rapidly removing carbon from the atmopshere, the temperatures should reflect within a year or two, and if we removed ALL of the anthropogenic delta-CO$_2$, we could expect temperatures to go back to pre-industrial revolution plus or minus any natural changes since then in about 10 years.

A side note: supposing we could sequester as much carbon as we put into the atmosphere every year. That would be great! But how much energy would it take to sequester that carbon? And where would we get the energy to sequester the carbon. Sequestration seems like a great idea, but I don't think it would work, even if an excellent method of sequestration could be found, until the world's energy demands are met from non-fossil fuel sources.

Baidu
map