< p >好吧,让我们先从一个粗略的全球地图(NCEP再分析)的平均风的速度(米/秒):< a href = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/CunMj.png " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > < img src = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/CunMj.png " alt = " NCEP再分析1981 - 2010年,看到http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/cgi-bin/data/composites/printpage.pl让自己“> < / > < / p > < p >乘以3.6公里/小时。所以你的范围基本上就是从3 m / s, 4 m / s。所以你看中等蓝色。有一些沿海地区。但是一般来说,沿海地区将有相当多的风……< / p > < p > < a href = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/cn26J.jpg " rel = " nofollow noreferrer " > < img src = " https://i.stack.imgur.com/cn26J.jpg " alt = "风摩擦影响,由加拿大环境" > < / > < / p > < p >这图形表示,基本上在海洋风从典型的土地价值增加15 - 60%。更令人心烦意乱的是沿海是8天你提不到52公里/小时。你在一个位置合理的中纬度地区,所以你通常有大风暴,风通常影响沿海地区,如发生,和白令海气旋。我认为它会很难找到一个海洋城市,不会超过52公里/小时超过8天在外面热带(假设你谈论短脉冲52公里/小时,而不是每天平均水平,但即使每天平均我认为可能超过52公里/小时8天每年大多数沿海城市)。< / p > < p >所以我很惊讶地看到它确实是一个沿海的位置。然而有一些可能适合仍然连接到水的地方。
1 - Near inland seas\lakes would have somewhat lower wind because of the diminished water fetch available and the decreased percentage of the year that wind flows over such water. 2 - The transition zone from marine winds to land winds is probably only something like 10-100 miles, while temperature moderation is still significant, even moreso if there is water on many sides. Because your temperature range is only indeed 31 C (56 F) wide, that certainly does seem to still suggest it has significant moisture influences.
Now, 21 C seems a fairly cool value (especially if that's the absolute maximum daytime peak during the year, but even an average of 21 seems a tad cool, especially for cities not right on the water. So that suggests to me that it's pretty far north, or perhaps abuts rather cool waters.
So, looking at the map, and based upon those ideas, I'd think the favorite might be inland Russia or China... or maybe around Italy\Greece. Just the right city location in the northern US or Canada might work too, like Portland (Oregon), Detroit, or Ottawa.