最近30从www.hoelymoley.com 2023 - 07 - 09 - t21:02:28z //www.hoelymoley.com/feeds/user/24873 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf //www.hoelymoley.com/q/23161 0 爸爸克鲁泡特金 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/24873 2021 - 11 - 16 - t17:59:29z 2021 - 11 - 16 - t20:42:59z

< p >我在< >强没有办法< /强>气候变化怀疑论者,也不是一个反对者。出于< a href = " //www.hoelymoley.com/questions/23144/how-to-explain-the-remarkable-regularity-of-the-increased-concentration-of-atmos?newreg = f650c03c5b034a238aed9a2797b036b5 " > < / >问题和一些文章我在线阅读:< / p > < p >有任何已知的自然过程在人类活动能够解释(最近的地质)上升的大气有限公司<跨类=“math-container”>“_2 < / span >美元浓度?< / p > < p >我也很好奇,因为我经常听到气候变化怀疑论者把这个,我不知道如何应对。< / p >

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/23161/alternative-natural-explanations-for-rise-in-atmospheric-co2?cid=53421 爸爸克鲁泡特金 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/24873 2021 - 11 - 17 - t16:42:04z 2021 - 11 - 17 - t16:42:04z

当然@AtmosphericPrisonEscape ....As I said I'm not denying that nor am I skeptical of that. I am literally asking about whether there are known processes/mechanisms that could, in principle, explain such CO2 concentration rise. I don't think it's so hard to understand why I would ask this, when in science it is common to have many possible explanations for some phenomenon, even if it is obvious that one is better than the others. I'm asking about the other possibilities.

//www.hoelymoley.com/questions/23161/alternative-natural-explanations-for-rise-in-atmospheric-co2?cid=53420 爸爸克鲁泡特金 //www.hoelymoley.com/users/24873 2021 - 11 - 17 - t16:40:14z 2021 - 11 - 17 - t16:40:14z

@Jean-MariePrival谢谢。That's precisely the kind of answer I'm curious about: possible natural mechanisms/processes that could, in principle, explain the CO2 concentration

map