我们应该要求3票close-reopen特性?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学元堆栈交换江南电子竞技平台 最近30从earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com 2023 - 07 - 10 - t23:07:35z https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/feeds/question/1901 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1901 0 我们应该要求3票close-reopen特性? user20559 https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/users/0 2021 - 05 - 09 - t17:19:43z 2022 - 02年- 15 - t00:06:00z 我读过< p > < a href = " https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/364007/testing-three-vote-close-and-reopen-on-13-network-sites?cb = 1 " >元文章< / >说一些网站正在测试3票关闭和重启功能。< / p > < p >在我看来版主要求应该包括我们这些网站。我的原因是没有足够的评论者在该网站的日常。For example it was hard to me to movilize users to close and delete the questions.

It is even more clear 3 votes to reopen would be accurated. I have seen how many questions marked to reopen were never opened after an edit. For example we loosed some on-topic identify-my-fossil questions because the proposals to reopen them were not seconded by the reviewers (and they were deleted by inertia when we were deleting all questions with tag).

 https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1901/should-we-ask-for-the-3-votes-to-close-reopen-feature/1947 # 1947 2 回答以user1271772应我们要求3票close-reopen特性? user1271772 https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/users/18946 2022 - 01 - 15 - t23:47:22z 2022 - 01 - 15 - t23:47:22z < p >。没有足够的社区成员希望。< / p >
Baidu
map