应该有一个标签喜马拉雅山呢?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学元堆栈交换江南电子竞技平台 最近30从earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com 2023 - 07 - 11 - t01:28:31z https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/feeds/question/1910 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1910 3 应该有一个标签喜马拉雅山呢? 迟到的 https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/users/21926 2021 - 05 - 20 - t23:02:15z 2021 - 05 - 26 - t00:41:12z < p >现在,我知道有一个标签山脉,但是人们以喜马拉雅山为例,,<强>人询问Indian-Eurasian板块碰撞每隔一段时间。 I'm taking the Community's Advice if there should be a tag called "The-Himalayas".

For example

note: There is already a tag that uses 8 posts.

 https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1910/-/1913 # 1913 2 答案由f。索普关于喜马拉雅山的应该有一个标签? f.thorpe https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/users/543 2021 - 05 - 25 - t19:05:08z 2021 - 05 - 26 - t00:41:12z

Doing a quick search on other tags on the site, it seems that "place" tags are pretty sparse. I see tags being used for bodies of water like oceans, and I see some land masses like continents and "greenland". If we introduce a tag for the Himalayas, it would seem that many places could also be added (e.g. Sahara, Hawaii, Australia, Africa, Andes, Alps, etc.), so it could potentially be a slippery slope. Personally I don't have a problem with adding more tags, but many users think they should be cleaned up. I think adding the Himalayas would be fine. We just have to be sure we are adding geographic places, not political places. For instance, Mediterranean is a current tag, but "Germany" was deleted. I agree with this idea and think we should delete tags like "California" but keep tags like "Greenland". Here is a post that discusses this more: Should we clean up the tags on this site?
Baidu
map