我们应该巩固降雨预报问题吗?- 江南体育网页版- - - - -地球科学元堆栈交换江南电子竞技平台 最近30从earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com 2023 - 07 - 10 - t23:05:36z https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/feeds/question/1925 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/rdf https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1925 4 我们应该巩固降雨预报问题吗? f.thorpe https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/users/543 2021 - 07 - 18 - t05:09:13z 2021 - 07 - 20 - t05:23:13z < p >有许多问题如何解释下雨天气预报。有些是集中在流行,有些是专注于数量,而另一些则集中在试图找到两者之间的关系。大多数新用户试图找出预测到底是什么意思。我想建议我们考虑这些重复和巩固他们的一个问题。修改后的问题自然会全面……something like "How should I interpret the rain forecast?" It would mean migrating good answers, which I think is possible. And we would probably get some good new answers. Here are the questions that are similar in nature:

Do people like this idea? Or is this too much micro-managing?

https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1925/-/1926 # 1926 2 答案为我们应该巩固uhoh降雨预报问题吗? uhoh https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/users/6031 2021 - 07 - 19 - t11:32:12z 2021 - 07 - 19 - t11:32:12z < p > <强> tl;博士:< /强> < em >去吧!

"A good idea" and "micro-managing" are not necessarily always exclusive ;-)

Closing as duplicates is the standard procedure, merging is rare, but I think that's mostly due to trepidation by mods, so if you are willing to do so are there any down sides to merging?

The only one I can think of is a loss of question content, and that can be mitigated by carefully crafting (or editing) the target question.

In meta, my question Have there been analyses to see if views of well-received answers are reduced by closure as duplicate which try to control for other factors? is well-received but currently unanswered.

...my concern has been that fewer future eyes will reach that good answer due to the closed status.

My hunch is that just closing n-1 questions does reduce visibility of otherwise good answers to them, and a well-done merger can have substantial long-term benefit by boosting visibility of all the good answers.

https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1925/-/1927 # 1927 1 答案由f。索普的我们应该巩固降雨预报问题吗? f.thorpe https://earthscience.meta.stackexchange.com/users/543 2021 - 07 - 20 - t05:23:13z 2021 - 07 - 20 - t05:23:13z < p >我认为这个想法是不错的理论,但在实践中有一些差异实际上是被要求。总之,我合并一个问题关于降雨量与另一个,而迁移的一个答案是重复的帖子。我也改变了标题的问题一些降水的概率问题,因为他们问的东西有点不同(尽管意图几乎相同的标题)。我剩下的几个帖子,我认为可以称为重复,但它们植根于具体的例子所以我离开他们独自。< / p >
Baidu
map