编辑-地球科学江南体育网页版堆栈交换江南电子竞技平台

你不是登录。你的编辑将被放置在一个队列,直到同行评议。

我们欢迎编辑,使读者更容易理解和更有价值。因为社区成员审查编辑,请尽量使文章更好比你怎么发现,例如,通过修正语法或添加额外的资源和超链接。

牧师

标题

身体

碳氢化合物中发现了大量(太阳系的其他地方)[1]在过去或现在的生活不太可能的证据。涉及任何化石。石油和天然气井干了50年前,发现补充的一小部分的输出。涉及任何化石。巨大(微生物的生物量)[2]和极端微生物在地球表面几次估计地表生物量的大小发现派生从甲烷和氧气的化学能量生命从硫酸盐和铁氧化物。甲烷的来源方式太深来自化石。涉及任何化石。这些最新发现和其他证据预言到科学家和研究员从康奈尔,托马斯·金撰写“深热生物圈,化石燃料的神话”)[3]。甚至在看到extremeophiles相对丰度的证据(最深的地雷)[4],黄金关系的地下生物圈“深地球气理论”给一个更合理的原始的解释烃类燃料比公认“化石”理论的形成。他认为“碳氢化合物不是由地质生物学改写(如传统的观点将),而是碳氢化合物由生物地质重做。” In other words, as in Saturn’s moon Titan and other hydrocarbon rich areas of the solar system, the source of hydrocarbons is **primordial**; but as they upwell into earth’s outer crust microbial life uses it as energy source. While the details of the Deep Earth Gas Theory are beyond scope of elaboration in this question area, the main points which Dr. Gold supports, and provides evidence for are: 1. **Hydrocarbons are primordial.** IOW, hydrocarbons like elsewhere in the solar systems are here since the planet's birth. 2. **The earth was subjected to only a partial melt.** 3. **Hydrocarbons are stable to great depth.** High pressure greatly stabilizes hydrocarbons against thermal dissociation. 4. **Rock at depth contains pores.** 5. **Primordial hydrocarbons are still upwelling from the deep earth.** some sub-points worthy of mention: It more adequately explains why Helium is only present in the earth at any mine-able quantity in natural gas. There are no pure Helium wells. Why the strong association of hydrocarbons with Helium, an inert gas that can have no chemical interactions with fossil organic materials or with hydrocarbons? This is known to geologists as the "Petroleum Paradox" and cannot be explained at all by a sedimentary origin of hydrocarbons. The presently accepted theory of fossil fuels is that the hydrocarbons formed from the decayed remains of ancient organic matter (fossils) that somehow sank down into the deep earth and got trapped in sedimentary rock formations where increased pressures assisted in converting the organic material over time to hydrocarbons. Well, hydrocarbons are found in depths where no surface life remains could have possibly geologically submerged to. The physics of how the ancient organic materials or the resulting hydrocarbons sank deep into the earth have yet to be explained. Also, hydrocarbons have been found in igneous rock formations, which the accepted surface to sediment theory cannot explain. Can we still say that fossil fuels are really from fossils? [1]: http://www.wnd.com/2005/12/33678/ [2]: https://gsw.silverchair-cdn.com/gsw/Content_public/Journal/geology/39/3/10.1130_focus032011.1/2/287.pdf?Expires=1500070338&Signature=BM8pz9XxjpBmQkcBK1re3emKnV5yV1XivHPpM2wczC-Tlfypz~jhlBPLSnSYWY3aAqtjFApaQIJK3p1z9kwuqTB6jsKS~1JrrWcHXcr3XkTEMNfq1kuRLtfVYPHX0QDxiSqmY8qouNl8vhH1OUs2inqn6r9nhgRPts-fu-KX4aBNXpl5eL3iJmjONPK96WLwnEJE2V1a-gXXDgwvL~CTiklKgVKIKQX0sftJao8uJdmfJhhkdqsRvA-iUi2GV8QbnVt8QPHzUGYxcXhJTnKXwkWKpqyjTwRSH~P6deT~T2i9SlW4ppi~d~uGyzKPZvgxURqRo4VnEDU8ulp~ppYTPw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIUCZBIA4LVPAVW3Q [3]: http://www.springer.com/us/book/9780387952536 [4]: https://www.space.com/12491-worms-beneath-earth-surface-extremophiles.html

标签

编辑总结

取消

2

\ begingroup美元如果我们考虑煤,也许最有力的证据,从化石植物形成的化石是在煤层随处可见。事实上,一些煤层是整个森林化石,如。smithsonianmag.com/history/… \ endgroup美元
- - - - - -jamesqf
2017年7月14日18:20
4

\ begingroup美元你在问一个问题或试图信奉一个意见吗?这个网站是询问和回答问题。我很确定这个网站不是为初始的哲学辩论的有效性并非由生物体产生的石油来源。 \ endgroup美元
- - - - - -Inkenbrandt
2017年7月19日14:56
1

\ begingroup美元你真正需要的来源无根据的断言和令人困惑的甲烷,石油和煤炭。形成以非常不同的方式,你不能认为别人是真的一个是真的。不像煤和石油甲烷有多个来源。 \ endgroup美元
- - - - - -约翰
2017年7月19日15:06

添加一个评论 |

正确的小错误或错误
澄清的意思,而不更改它
添加相关资源或链接
总是尊重作者的意图
不使用编辑与作者回复