编辑-地球科学江南体育网页版堆栈交换江南电子竞技平台

你不是登录。你的编辑将被放置在一个队列,直到同行评议。

我们欢迎编辑,使读者更容易理解和更有价值。因为社区成员审查编辑,请尽量使文章更好比你怎么发现,例如,通过修正语法或添加额外的资源和超链接。

牧师

我们怎么知道小行星形成地球的同时?

延续的问题为什么地球的年龄由约会陨石而不是自己的石头?我们有什么证据,确实小行星形成地球的同时?有没有实物证据,或者是主要通过仿真结论吗?

回答

也许有点退一步获得了更多的观点是必需的。注意这条线在迈克尔所提供的答案——“这可能是错误的”。这个问题揭示一些非常明显的假设:1。我们知道地球是如何形成的。2。我们知道地球形成的时候。当前的吸积理论并不持有多水,比喻和说话。只是没有灰尘或岩石在空间可以依附本身形成一个身体如地球。连最基本的物理不同意这一点。模拟必须忽略这个基本事实,而是介绍软糖因素使岩石和尘埃碰撞时“粘”在一起。 You just go out and try making rocks stick together when they smash into each other - confirm for yourself whether it will work in space where there's even less resistance to flying apart. Furthermore, even if one allows for some miraculous hot sludge of radioactive material to stick together, one immediately creates another problem: the exclusion of water because of heat. There is no acceptable way for all the water on earth to arrive here from outer space. Why would the water only strike earth [ and where would it come from in the first place ] in such a way that Mars, Venus and the moon do not have any evidence of a watery bombardment? Then there's the question of how does one measure the age of anything? Age is unfortunately not a physical property that we can measure directly like length, volume, density, etc. In order to know the age of anything one needs to have been present when it came into existence and then to have some way by which to assign some kind of measure of passage of time to it. In short - age is an abstract construct that cannot be measured physically. What can be measured is the proportions of the number of atoms of mother and daughter products of radioactive material. But having established that proportion and applying a rate of decay to determine age doesn't give a true age. Have you ever found a record of calibration that confirms that the radioactive methodology does indeed deliver the correct age? Did someone witness and record the creation of basic radioactive rock and then track it's age using the radioactive decay method? To my mind, it hasn't been done and in fact where some measurements have been made of newly created basalt in St Helen's eruption, the ages produced are plain incorrect. The best that it can produce is an "age" based on some very questionable assumptions. Since we do not know the history of the earth we need to make some assumptions regarding its creation. We need some form of "clock" by which we can measure how old the earth is. That clock has to be independent of the earth itself, hence why people use meteoroids, under the assumption that it must be at least as old as if not older than the earth itself. The main problem is that we need to know when that clock started ticking and we just don't have any means to establish an objective way to determine that. No one was there to witness and record that event. There-in lies the problem. Even if you assume that the radio-active decay happened at a constant rate[ which we have seen is now no longer true ], you still have to make assumptions about the quantities involved. But therein lies another problem - you don't know the origin and history of the original material - how long did IT exist before it started its radioactivity? One can go on ad-infinitum. So in spite of the highly "scientific" answer provided by Michael, the fact is that one cannot determine the age of the earth without making some highly metaphysical assumptions about the origin of the universe. You have to make some questionable unsubstantiated assumptions as to how the whole universe came into being. It cannot be determined scientifically, in spite of using the latest and greatest technology in cosmology today. We simply weren't there. We have no eye-witness account. We have no record. The best we can do is make assumptions of the starting point. You may not like this answer. You may even get angry at seeing it but unfortunately for you, you cannot push it's validity out of the way.

编辑总结

取消

\ begingroup美元你好,欢迎来到地球科学。江南体育网页版,请注意,这不是一个讨论论坛,请包括链接的资源来断言你是在你的答案。 \ endgroup美元
- - - - - -user889
2014年11月21日在6:02
3

\ begingroup美元当然我可以把它的有效性。没有资源和一些明显的错误/误解你的推理。 \ endgroup美元
- - - - - -nbubis
2014年11月21日在18
1

\ begingroup美元凯文,你的回答有很多错误的事情,我甚至不知道从哪里开始。 \ endgroup美元
- - - - - -Gimelist
2014年11月21日11:09
1

\ begingroup美元你不需要看地球要知道它是多大。如果我回家,发现一壶水开始沸腾,我可以算出多长时间在我的炉子。测量了相同数量的水在利用温度和执行一个实验。我没有一直都存在的。当然,这里有一个假设。最初的水在锅里热还是冷?也许吧。但我可以得到一个具体的时间范围。我可以得到一个固体温度近似使用水龙头。你双引号“科学”上面像你说的他的回答不是。 In fact it was. \ endgroup美元
- - - - - -保罗
2014年11月21日在22:32
\ begingroup美元几乎每一个语句凯文鲁伊特认为答案是伪科学的华夫格,科学天真,只是错误的。 \ endgroup美元
- - - - - -戈登斯坦格
2016年8月20日在两点

| 显示1更多的评论

正确的小错误或错误
澄清的意思,而不更改它
添加相关资源或链接
总是尊重作者的意图
不使用编辑与作者回复

创建代码用引号”或式子~篱笆
' ' '
像这样
' ' '
添加语言标识符来突出显示的代码
”“python
def函数(foo):
打印(foo)
' ' '
把段落之间的回报
在结束linebreak添加2个空间
_italic_或* *的* *
报价将>开始的
做链接(尽量使用https)
< https://example.com >
(例子)(https://example.com)
< a href = " https://example.com " > < / >示例
MathJax方程罪\ \ ^ 2θ美元

格式帮助»
回答帮助»

MathJax帮助»