Having learned about the Milankovitch cycles, I've found two entirely separate explanations from different sources on how the combination of precession and eccentricity changes affect glaciation vs deglaciation. Some sources I've found state that the combination of high eccentricity and Northern Hemisphere winter at aphelion (and hence summer at perihelion) leads to glaciation in the Northern Hemisphere, since the winters are particularly cold (both because high eccentricity means the distance from the sun at aphelion is particularly high, and because aphelion winters would be longer compared to the corresponding perihelion summers, since the earth moves slower around the sun at aphelion compared to the perihelion). However, other sources state that it is the amount of sunlight during summer solstice in the Northern Hemisphere summer that drives deglaciation. Namely, high eccentricity in combination with a perihelion Northern Hemisphere summer would now lead todeglaciation, not glaciation. This is because with high eccentricity, the distance to the sun at summer would be particularly low, hence sunlight intensity would be particularly high during the summers. On the other hand, all sources I've seen agree that high obliquity favors deglaciation.
So which is it? Does high eccentricity in combination with perihelion Northern Hemisphere summers (and hence aphelion winters) lead to deglaciation or glaciation? I'd love a direct answer together with an explanation.