首先,尼安德特人的原因(N)灭绝肯定不知道。尽管没有证据表明暴力(*)。有一个(重叠)[1]在欧洲(N,在解剖学上现代人类几千年(抗苗勒氏管激素),即使N找到网站仅限于Mousterien行业。这是一个保守的限制,因为N可能使用[更先进的技术][1]像刀片生产在过去几千年,这将扩展N存在~ 32000个基点。江南登录网址app下载等网站Gorham洞穴融入画面,但这个长时间的N[讨论][2]和[counterdebated] [3]: -))。无论如何,早在去年冰川最大(20 ~ 23肯塔基州BP)他们都消失了。有些(过时的)[4]认为,N是一个冷适应人类的血统。服装(骨头针)工具的外观与Aurignacien大幅上升,第一块石头工具行业在欧洲抗苗勒氏管激素有关。,当然并不意味着N没有使用的衣服,但他们可能没有一样精通Cro马侬姑娘和使他们的配偶。找到网站的(相关)[5]和气候图片确认N避免寒冷气候。 N populations were smaller than AMH, though [not really endangered by genetic bottlenecks][6] (there is newer work concerning Denisovans, stating they never really split from N, but i can't find it). By now it pretty clear that N and AMH [interbred][7] on [many occasions][8]. So why did they become extinct ? Together with other ice age megafauna in a highly stressed environment, loosing their way of subsistence ? Competition of top predators ? [Inbreading][9] nevertheless ? Dwindling numbers and simple merge with AMH ? [Bad luck][10] ? Unclear ... (*) I want to add a remark here to the Shanidar 3 guy mentioned below. First of all, the authors do not exclude an accident. Second, the work has been criticized by Trinkhaus et al. for methodological errors, as is cited [here][11]. I do not categorically exclude violence in the paleolithic, the accusation is unfair, I only say there is no (undisputed) evidence. Btw.: we haven't been at the meat of that yet, but i am not handing out fuel against my argumentation ;-) It was stated that > "Our ancestors killed the males of other tribes and raped the few remaining females. That our ancestors killed Neandertals who looked rather different is not a far stretch from killing other anatomically modern humans who looked only slightly different." Both claims are not backed by science, [Cro Magnon][12] and [Neandertals][13] were not that different (reconstructions Neandertal Museum, Mettmann, Germany) and normal people don't just attack others. That men were killed and woman stolen is a possiblity in the Neolithic and contemporary Mesolithic and later, though, but that's not the point here. Surely not in the cold steppe of paleolithic Europe for obvious reasons: when the loss of a hunter could endanger the whole group; and women - having one child at a time to keep up the pace of mobility - moved around with the group. At the time 40kyBP population was low, it must rather be assumed that any accidental meating was a cause of celebration and ... cultural ... sexual ... you get it :-) Proof is in us. With us. And so :-) [1]: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13621 [2]: https://www.pnas.org/content/110/8/2781 [3]: https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(17)30864-2?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2405844017308642%3Fshowall%3Dtrue [4]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047248410002198?via%3Dihub [5]: https://www.pnas.org/content/115/37/9116 [6]: https://www.pnas.org/content/114/37/9859.full [7]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4947341/ [8]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0735-8 [9]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-38571-1 [10]: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225117 [11]: https://averyremoteperiodindeed.blogspot.com/2011/05/who-really-killed-shanidar-3.html [12]: https://www.neanderthal.de/en/archaic-humans.html [13]: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/af/46/1b/af461ba463f0df60b43316019fa0dc08.jpg