* *关于出版物* * >发表在一个公认的科学期刊气候学似乎满足规范。发表一些关于天气的博客似乎不符合这个规范。我同意这一点,但受人尊敬的科学期刊如*(自然)[1]* ((ref 2)[2])和*(科学美国人)[3]* ([ref 2][4])也将满足规范。文章/论文出版科学并不总是直截了当。有时有一个元素“本月味道”一些期刊。发表论文,关于一个特定方面的科学现在发布别的东西。在这种情况下,作者可能寻求在第二次或第三次选择的杂志出版。* *关于作者* *两个东西是进口:作者的资格和他们出版的历史。>气候学满足规范,博士学位学士学位气象学可能似乎也满足规范,我们如何决定的界限呢?博士学位的人可能是一个专家一个字段的一个方面。有学士学位的人可能是一个多面手。作者的经验也是进口的。 Someone with a bachelor's degree may have many years of work experience in their field but never bothered to seek higher academic qualifications. Someone with a history of publishing "quality" papers in respected journals will have greater respect amongst their peers than some who has published very few papers, lesser quality papers or in lesser quality publications. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_(journal) [2]: https://www.nature.com/nature/about/ [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_American [4]: https://www.scientificamerican.com/