简短的回答是肯定的,这是有可能的。,它还可以减少伤害。# # #在这里总结变化的简要总结时发生的变化从风力涡轮机发电,而不是从化石或核电站:——风的能量被进一步比它原本是逆风,就有更多的动荡顺风风力涡轮机-低品位热量少投入化石周围的环境或核电站被拒绝,或关闭,因为现在的电力供应来自风能。- - - - - - # # #全球影响,据我们所知这是不可能会有任何合理的全球影响水平的全球部署(比方说,太瓦的平均功率,但低于数万太瓦)。但一行涡轮机就足以导致当地的影响,这些可能是积极的还是消极的。有一个公开讨论文献中关于去除的影响太瓦的风力发电将<子> *(引用,请在评论中平我如果我不添加这些在一天左右)* < /订阅>。但这是一个理论的讨论,而不是真正有意义的,因为它将完全取决于提取。# # #风的能量会发生什么变化?最终,几乎所有能源在风中最终低品位热量。不管它会通过风力涡轮机或没有。 If not, it will eventually dissipate due to friction, where it becomes ambient low-grade heat. If it is, then it will get converted into electricity, then some energy service (e.g. lighting), and then ambient low-grade heat. So deploying lots of wind turbines just moves *where* that energy gets taken out of the wind, but not how much. ###What are the energy changes, and where? The full picture is more complicated. Whether switching from fossil/nuclear to wind would change patterns of energy service demand, and energy efficiency, is an open question, so there are plenty of ripple effects. But, putting those aside to simplify things, just switching from fossil/nuclear to wind wouldn't create new sinks for the low-grade heat: lighting would carry on getting used at the same time and place as it does at the moment. What would happen is that energy would be extracted from the wind in new places: at turbines, rather than further downwind where the energy would be dissipated by friction. The other thing that would change is that there would no longer be additional sources of low-grade heat at all those fossil and nuclear power stations. Now, they're pretty intense sources of heat: nuclear or coal plants typically push out 150% - 200% as much energy as local heat, as they do electricity. So that's a signicant input of heat into a local weather system, which would no longer be there when they're turned off because the electricity is being supplied from wind instead. ###Consequences and conclusions Distributions of heat affect weather and climate. So, deploying lots of wind turbines can change local patterns of evaporation and rainfall. They can also change patterns of frost: the turbines increase the turbulence in the flow, close to the ground, reducing frosts: there are farms that deploy turbines in order to harness that frost-prevention. So that's the ultimate change: energy would be extracted from the wind further upstream than it was previously; and there's less heat put into the system from the cooling systems at fossil and nuclear power stations. These are all local weather effects, and could be beneficial, harmful, or neutral.